Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal
INDIASIGN PVT LTD vs BRAND VALUE COMMUNICATIONS LTD & ANR. on 5 October 2026
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
NEW DELHI
Dated:
05/10/2026
BROADCASTING PETITION/13/2024
WITH
MISC APPLICATION/261/2024
WITH
MISC APPLICATION/85/2026
Petitioner Name:
Indiasign Pvt Ltd
Versus
Respondent Name: Brand Value Communications Ltd & Anr.
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRUBHAI NARANBHAI PATEL, CHAIRPERSON
HON'BLE DR. SANJEEV BANZAL ,MEMBER
For Applicants/Appellants/
Petitioners Advocate
Ms. Payal KakraMs. Tanya Gupta Mr. PranavMr. Pranjal Singh For Respondents Advocate Mr. Vedant Pathak For R1Mr. Chinmay Bhattacharya AndMr. Supriyo Roy Karmakar ( Directors For R1);
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. When we have earlier passed the orders on more than one occasion to give the Bank transaction details of the Directors of the respondent no.1 and today when we are asking what is the name of the Bank, they are deliberately not speaking the correct name of the Bank.
3. It is too much that the Directors of the respondent no.1 is not giving the name of the Bank when repeatedly we are asking. This is too much an adamant approach of the Directors of the respondent no.1 whose names are Mr. Chinmay Bhattacharya and Mr. Supriyo Roy Karmakar.
4. Even the Bank Statement which they have suppli ed, there is no mentioning of the name of the Bank at all. Moreover, earlier they have supplied the Bank Accounts in seven different Banks whereas now they are speaking about only one Bank. We do not have any correct numbers of Bank Accounts and in how many Banks. Hence, we hereby direct the aforesaid two Directors of respondent no.1 to remain personally present before this Tribunal on next date of hearing at 11:00 A .M.
5. On the next date of hearing, we hereby direct the aforesaid two Directors of the respondent no.1 to present before this Tribunal the Bank Statements of all the Banks in which there are Bank Accounts of respondent no.1 with stamp and signature of the Bank authority.
6. Hence, the matter is adjourned on 05.11.2026.
( JUSTICE D. N. PATEL)CHAIRPERSON
( DR. SANJEEV BANZAL)MEMBER
/AS/