Securities Appellate Tribunal

Stephanotis Finance Ltd. vs BSE Limited & Another on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT

MUMBAI

DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

CORAM : Justice P. S. Dinesh Kumar, Presiding Officer Ms. Meera Swarup, Technical Member Dr. Dheeraj Bhatnagar, Technical Member

Appeal No. 280 of 2026

And

Misc. Application No. 640 of 2026

Between

Stephanotis Finance Limited

3rd, Ground Floor, Durga Chambers,

Veena Industrial Estate,

Off Veera Desai Road,

Andheri (West), Mumbai – 400 053.

…. Appellant

By Mr. Shreyash V. Chaturvedi, Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Chaturvedi, Mr. Ratnesh Dube, Mr. Dhruv Bhinde, Advocates for the Appellant.

And

1. BSE Limited

Floor 25, P. J. Towers,

Dalal Street, Mumbai - 400 001.

2. Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051.

…. Respondents

By Mr. Sagar Divekar, Advocate with Mr. Abhimanyu Mhapankar, Ms.

Saumya

Mishra,

Advocates

for

the

Respondent No. 1 - BSE Limited.

Mr. Ishan Agrawal, Advocate with Ms. Rasika Ghate, Mr. Kush Khandelwal, Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, Ms. Asmita Pandey, Mr.

Prakshal

Jain,

Advocates

i/b

Nyaayam

Associates for the Respondent No. 2 - SEBI.

THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 23L OF SCRA, 1956 TO SET ASIDE ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 26, 2026 (EX-A) PASSED BY BSE LIMITED.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS 05TH

DAY OF OCTOBER 2026, THIS TRIBUNAL PASSED THE

FOLLOWING:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

Per : Justice P. S. Dinesh Kumar, Presiding Officer (Oral)

This appeal is directed against order dated 26.02.2026, passed by the Delisting Committee, BSE Limited. There is a delay of 80 days in filing this appeal.

2. We have heard Mr. Shreyash V. Chaturvedi, learned Advocate for the appellant, Mr. Sagar Divekar, learned Advocate for the respondent No. 1 – BSE and Mr. Ishan Agrawal, learned Advocate for the respondent No. 2 – SEBI.

3. For the reasons stated therein, the application for condonation of delay is allowed. Delay of 80 days in filing this appeal is condoned and Misc. Application No. 640 of 2026 is disposed of.

4. This is a delisting matter. Mr. Sagar Divekar, learned Advocate for the BSE submitted that if the appellant desires to comply with the non-compliances within a fixed time, this Tribunal may consider granting a self-operating order.

5. Learned Advocate for the appellant submitted that appellant has received the list of non-compliances and the SOP fines. He sought eight weeks to do all the compliances.

6. The appeal is disposed of by placing the submission of the learned Advocate for the appellant on record. All pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

No costs.

Justice P. S. Dinesh Kumar Presiding Officer

Ms. Meera Swarup Technical Member

Dr. Dheeraj Bhatnagar Technical Member 05.10.2026 VPM

MRS PRAMILA Digitally signed by MRS PRAMILA Date: 2026.10.08 15:04:19 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead