Central Government Industrial Tribunal
CGIT2 Delhi Order dated 08.09.2026 passed in EPF Appeals on 8 September 2026
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2 DELHI; Appeal No. D-2/07/2021 M/s. International Hospital Ltd.
Appellant Through:- Sh. Anil Bhatt, ld. counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida
Respondent Through:- Sh. Chakradhar Panda, ld. counsel and Sh. Ravinder Kumar, A/R for the respondent Order Dated:-08.09.2026
Final arguments in the matter heard in part. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submit he has not received any copy of the enclosures on which basis the Enforcement Officer has prepare his report. It is a matter of record that on trial court record, Enforcement Officer’s deposition dated 15.09.2020has the enclosure i.e. the wages sheet showing the bifurcation of the salary in different heads and the order sheet in this respect reflect that the same has been supplied to the A/R of the establishment who had appeared on that date. Without going through any controversy, office is directed to supply the copy of the report along with the enclosures after copying it from the photocopy machine of this tribunal. However, by that time counsel had sought permission to leave the court because of hearing the news of happening with Sh. K.K. Pandey, his junior. Ld. counsel for the appellant is directed to collect the same from the registry. List the matter on 13.10.2026 for further arguments. A copy of this order be supplied to both the parties through email.
(Atul Kumar Garg) Presiding Officer
D-2/19/2021 & D-2/05/2023 M/s Ghatak Security Services vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida.
Present: Sh. Ravi Ranjan, Ld. counsel for the appellant.
Sh. B.B. Pradhan, ld. counsel & Sh. Ravindra Kumar,
A/R for the respondent.
Order dated-08.09.2026
Final argument in both these matters heard and concluded. The matter is reserved for pronouncement of order.
Page 1 of 4
D-2/33/2022 M/s OYO Hotels & Homes Pvt. Ltd.
…. Appellant Through:- Sh. Anil Bhatt, Sh. K.K. Pandey & Sh. Ashish Ojha, ld. counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram Central
…. Respondent Through:- Sh. B.B. Pradhan, ld. counsel & Sh. Manjeet Jakhar, A/R for the respondent.
Order dated-08.09.2026
Ld. counsels for the appellant seek an adjournment stating that the son of Sh. K.K. Pandey, ld. counsel is ill and gets to be hospitalized immediately. Counsels for the appellant are allowed to leave.
Ld. counsel for the respondent has filed certain documents along with pen-drive containing the list of employees who are getting special allowance and how many employees have been added while determining the dues. He also undertakes to provide the soft copy of the data provided in pen drive to ld. counsel for the appellant through email. Ld. counsel for the appellant can collect the copy of other documents supplied today from the registry. List the matter on 26.10.2026 for final arguments. A copy of this order be supplied to both the parties through email.
Page 2 of 4
D-2/09/2023 M/s Oravel Stays Limited
…. Appellant Through:- Sh. Anil Bhatt, Sh. K.K. Pandey & Sh. Ashish Ojha, ld. counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram Central …. Respondent Through:- Sh. B.B. Pradhan, ld. counsel & Sh. Manjeet Jakhar, A/R for the respondent.
Order dated-08.09.2026
Ld. counsels for the appellant seek an adjournment stating that the son of Sh. K.K. Pandey, ld. counsel is ill and gets to be hospitalized immediately. Considering the prayer and in the interest of justice, adjournment is granted. List the matter on 26.10.2026 for final arguments.
Page 3 of 4
D-2/22/2022 M/s Jaypee HealthCare Ltd.
…. Appellant Through:- Sh. Jitesh Pandey & Sh. Aniket Singh, ld. counsel for the appellant. Vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida
…. Respondent Through:- Sh. Raushan Kumar, proxy counsel and Sh. Ravindra Singh, A/R for the respondent.
Order dated-08.09.2026
Perusal of the record reveals that this case is getting adjourned since last two dates due to non-engagement of the counsel by respondent. The proxy counsel appearing for the respondent submits that department has engaged his senior Ms. Jagriti Singh recently and she has still not received the record of this case from the department.
The counsel for respondent is directed to inspect the case file within a week and collect the certified copies after applying the same in registry in the subsequent week. List the matter on 13.10.2026 for final arguments. It is made clear that no further adjournment shall be allowed in this matter. A copy of this order be supplied to both the parties through email.
Page 4 of 4
Loading citations and judicial treatment…