CGIT2 Delhi Order dated 30.07.2026 passed in EPF Appeals on 30 July 2026

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2 DELHI; Appeal No. D-2/15/2026 M/s. Lotus Herbals Pvt. Ltd.

Appellant Through:- Sh.S.K. Khanna, ld. counsel & Sh. D.K. Gupta and Sh. Manvendra Deo, A/R for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida

Respondent Through:- Sh. Azam Mansoori, proxy counsel (for Sh. Kaushik Kr. Dey, ld. counsel) & Sh. Gurpreet Singh, A/R for the respondent. Order Dated:-30.07.2026

Today case is listed for filing of reply to misc. application filed under Section 7O of the EPF & MP Act, 1952. However, proxy counsel appearing for the respondent has filed copy of reply to the appeal which is not signed by the ld. counsel for respondent stating that Sh. Kaushik Kr. Dey is busy in arguing a matter before Delhi High Court and requested to adjourn the matter.

A copy of the reply is also supplied to ld. counsel for the appellant. In the interest of justice, prayer to grant adjournment is allowed. List the matter on 04.08.2026. In the meanwhile, interim orders to continue till next date of hearing.

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2 DELHI; Appeal No. D-2/10/2025 M/s. FMI Automotive Components Pvt. Ltd. …. Appellant Through:- Sh. Anil Bhatt & Sh. Ashish Ojha, ld. counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram West

…. Respondent Through:- Sh. Narender Kumar, ld. counsel for the respondent Order Dated:-30.07.2026

Today case is listed for filing of rejoinder by ld. counsel for appellant. However, he seeks a time of four weeks to file the same. In the interest of justice, prayer to grant more time for filing rejoinder is allowed with a direction to supply the advance copy of rejoinder to ld. counsel for respondent in advance.

List the matter on 01.09.2026 for final arguments.

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2 DELHI; Appeal No. D-2/45/2024

M/s. Rishi Vastra Vyapar Pvt. Ltd.

Appellant Through:- :- Sh. Siddharth Jha, proxy counsel (for Sh. Prakash Kumar, ld. counsel) for the appellant.

Vs.

RPFC/APFC, Gurgaon East

…Respondent Through:- Sh. Chakradhar Panda, ld. counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated:-30.07.2026

Counsel for the respondent submits that he had supplied the soft copy of the reply to this appeal to ld. counsel for appellant on 15.07.2026. He has filed the hard copy of reply today and also supplied a copy of the same to proxy counsel appearing for the appellant who prays for some time to file the rejoinder. In the interest of justice, prayer to grant time for filing rejoinder is allowed. List the matter on 19.08.2026 for filing rejoinder by appellant.

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT No. 2/EPFAT, DELHI

D-2/33/2022 M/s OYO Hotels & Homes Pvt. Ltd.

…. Appellant Through:- Sh. Anil Bhatt & Sh. Ashish Ojha, ld. counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram Central …. Respondent Through:- Sh. B.B. Pradhan, ld. counsel & Sh. Manjeet Jakhar, A/R for the respondent.

Order dated-30.07.2026

Part arguments have been heard extensively from both the parties. Ld. counsel for the respondent Sh. Pradhan tries to satisfy this tribunal the query that how many employees are getting special allowance and how many employees have been added while determining the dues. He is directed to supply the same within four weeks subject to supply of copy to ld. counsel for the appellant so that he can reply. So far so first assessment is concerned, Ld. counsel for the respondent is agree that the dues are required to be calculated for only twenty days i.e. from 10th of October when the strength of the establishment has crossed the limit of twenty employees. List the matter on 01.09.2026 for further consideration.

Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT No. 2/EPFAT, DELHI

D-2/09/2023 M/s Oravel Stays Limited …. Appellant

appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram Central …. Respondent Through:- Sh. B.B. Pradhan, ld. counsel & Sh. Manjeet Jakhar, A/R for the respondent.

Order dated-30.07.2026

Ld. counsel for the respondent submits that he will file a detailed list of employees who were getting the special allowance, on the next date of hearing. He is allowed to do so subject to supply of copy to ld. counsel for the appellant so that he can reply. List the matter on 01.09.2026.

Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)