CGIT2 Delhi EPF matters Orders dated 01.07.2026 on 1 July 2026

M/s. Lotus Herbals Pvt. Ltd.

Appellant Through:- Sh.S.K. Khanna, ld. counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida

Respondent Through:- Sh. Kaushik Kumar Dey, ld. counsel for the respondent. Order Dated:-01.07.2026

Proxy counsel appearing for the respondent submits that he has received the appeal file from the office of the respondent only yesterday and he wants time to file his reply.

From perusal of the appeal filed in two volumes certain documents are found missing. Counsel for the appellant submits that he will file the documents and submit them after proper pagination arranging them in running sequence. He is also directed to file the same within two weeks after supplying the cop[y in advance to ld. counsel for the respondent. Let the matter be listed for arguments on the misc. application under Section 7 O of the Act on 30.07.2026. In the meanwhile, interim orders to continue till next date of hearing.

Later:

Sh. Kaushik Kumar Dey, ld. counsel for the respondent appeared and noted the proceedings of the day.

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT No. 2/EPFAT, DELHI

D-2/06/2024 M/s. Jubilant Generics Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC Noida D-2/07/2024 M/s Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC Noida

D-2/08/2023 M/s Jubilant Pharmova Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC Noida Present: Sh. Jitesh Pandey, Prakash Kumar & Aniket

Singh, ld.Counsels for the appellant. Sh. Kaushik Dey, ld. Counsel alongwith Sh. Vijay Pal, AR for the respondent.

Order dated-01.07.2026 Ld. counsel for the respondent has filed his written submissions along with relied upon case laws. Final arguments in the matter heard and concluded. The matter is reserved for pronouncement of order.

Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)

M/s. Intelnet Global Services Pvt. Ltd. Appellant Through:- Sh. Vikas, proxy counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram

Respondent Through:- Sh. B.B. Pradhan, ld. counsel for the respondent Order Dated:-01.07.2026

Proxy counsel appearing for the appellant requested for an adjournment stating that main counsel Sh. Saumitra Singhal is busy in cross examination before another labour court on third floor of this court premises. In the interest of justice, adjournment granted. List the matter on 29.07.2026 for final arguments.

M/s. OPPO Mobile India Pvt. Ltd.

Appellant Through:- Sh. Rajan Jha, ld. counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida

Respondent Through:- Sh. B.B. Pradhan, proxy counsel (For Sh. S.N.

Mahanta, ld. counsel ) & Sh. Prem Narayan Singh, A/R

for the Respondent. Order Dated:-01.07.2026

Office has placed on record a letter of EPFO Regional Office Greater Noida wherein it is stated that the case has been assigned to Sh. S.N. Mahanta only day before yesterday and he is in the process of seeking the records from the department. Sh. B.B. Pradhan, proxy counsel appearing on behalf of Sh. S.N. Mahanta also submitted the same. List the matter on 14.07.2026. In the meanwhile, ld. counsel for the respondent is directed to take the documents from the department and argue the matter positively on the next date of hearing.