Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal

DEN RAJKOT CITY COMMUNICATION PVT LTD vs KIRITBHAI BHUPATBHAI RATHOD AND ORS on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

NEW DELHI

Dated:

07/10/2026

BROADCASTING PETITION/165/2018

WITH

MISC APPLICATION/181/2018

WITH

MISC APPLICATION/217/2018

Petitioner Name:

Den Rajkot City Communication Pvt Ltd

Versus

Respondent Name: Kiritbhai Bhupatbhai Rathod And Ors BEFORE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM, MEMBER

For Applicants/Appellants/

Petitioners Advocate

Mr. Vibhav SrivastavaMs Aashi Arora Ms Dishti Yadav For Respondents Advocate Mr. Baishnoni Meher For R-1Mr. Upender Thakur, Ms. Vishakha U. Thakur, Ms. Karishma Singh, Ms. Shreya Kardam R-2

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

1. Case taken up. Learned Counsel for both side are present.

2. These two Miscellaneous Applications are listed together, whereas, there is specific order of this Tribunal that the Petition is to be decided, wherein, these Miscellaneous Applications will be decided together. Hence, separate listing is not needed. More so, Learned Counsel for Petitioner mentioned that the relief prayed by those Miscellaneous Applications are to be adjudged in final Petition. Hence, they need not to be listed separately.

3. Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1 mentioned that inspite of its best effort, Respondent No. 1 is neither giving any instruction, nor cooperating for its behalf. Hence, either a discharge be given or a notice to Respondent No. 1 be got issued.

4. Let, this fact be got communicated by Counsel itself to its client, with regard to proposed discharged and opportunity to engage Counsel afresh, if Respondent No. 1 desires so. And in a case no response, the proceeding against Respondent No. 1 may be taken exparte. Then Counsel need not to appear.But, the notice of this discharge is to be given by the Counsel and be placed on the record.

5. List the matter on 19.12.2026 “for further hearing”.

( JUSTICE RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM)MEMBER

/AA/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead