CGIT2 Delhi EPF matters Orders dated 26.05.2026 on 26 May 2026

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2 DELHI; Item no. 1 Appeal No. D-2/02/2026 M/s. S.D. Enterprises

Appellant Through:- Sh. Siddharth Jha, proxy counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Meerut

Respondent Through:- Sh. Narender Kumar & Sh. Anirudh Kumar, ld. counsel for the respondent Order Dated:-26.05.2026

Ld. counsel for the appellant has filed copy of reply to misc. application filed under Section 7 O of the EPF & MP Act, 1952. Proxy counsel appearing for the appellant stated that Sh. Prakash Kumar, ld. counsel is busy in arguing a matter before Hon’ble Delhi High Court and requested to adjourn the matter for tomorrow. In the interest of justice, adjournment granted. List the matter tomorrow i.e. on 27.05.2026 for arguments on the application filed under section 7 O of the Act.

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2 DELHI; Item no. 2

Appeal No. D-2/20/2025 M/s. Launch My Career Pvt. Ltd.

.…. Appellant Through:- Sh. Siddharth Jha, proxy counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida and Ors.

…. Respondent Through:- None for the respondent Order Dated:-26.05.2026

Today, the case is listed for filing of reply to the appeal, however, none is present for the respondent. In the interest of justice, one more chance is given to the respondent for filing of reply. List the matter on 09.07.2026 for filing of reply. A copy of this order be sent through email to the respondent.

Later: At 12:55 P.M.

Ms. Saumya, proxy counsel & Sh. Vijay Pal Singh, A/R for the respondent appeared and noted the proceedings of the day.

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT No. 2/EPFAT, DELHI

Item no. 3 D-2/26/2021 M/s Convergys India Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram.

Present: Sh. Tapony Ghose, proxy counsel for the appellant.

Sh. B.B Pradhan, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.

Order dated-26.05.2026

The proxy counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that Sh. S.K. Gupta, ld. counsel for the appellant has to move to Bangalore due to some urgency and requested for an adjournment. In the interest of justice, adjournment granted. Perusal of the record reveals that the matter has been heard in part on the previous date. Therefore, list the matter on 14.07.2026 for remaining arguments.

Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)