Central Government Industrial Tribunal

CGIT2 Delhi EPF matters Orders dated 22.05.2026 on 22 May 2026

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2/EPFAT DELHI

D-2/18/2025 M/s Ahrestey India Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram West.

Present: None for the Appellant.

Sh. Lalit Kumar, AR for the Respondent.

Order dated-22.05.2026 Vide my separate, order application for giving stay of the execution stands allowed without any condition of deposit. Put up for filing of reply to the main appeal on 20.07.2026. Respondent is directed to file the reply within six weeks with direction to supply/furnish the copy of the same to the appellant’s counsel.

ATUL KUMAR GARG (Presiding Officer)

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2 DELHI; Appeal No. D-2/04/2024

M/s. E-Meditek Insurance Ltd. …..Appellant Through:- Sh. Amit Bansal, ld. counsel for the appellant.

Vs.

RPFC/APFC, Gurugram

…Respondent Through:- Sh. S.N. Mahanta, ld.counsel & Sh. Lalit Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated:-22.05.2026

Ld. counsel for the appellant submitted a letter dated 11.05.2026 written to RPFC, Gurugram related to reconciliation of PF contributions. The same is taken on record.

Page 1 of 2

During the course of arguments, respondent has failed to provide the details of orders passed against the appellant establishment till date. Also the respondent could not provide the name of the PF subscribers in whose respect, the Employee share stands deposited as per the impugned order.

Ld. counsel as well as the A/R for the respondent are directed to come prepared on the issue that how many orders have been passed under section 7A, 14B & 7Q in whose respect the recovery proceedings are going on. Respondent is directed to provide such orders, recovery certificates and recovery done till date in respect of those orders. Further, respondent is also directed to provide the details of the subscribers i.e. their name and EPF account number in whose respect, the Employee share has shown as deposited in the impugned order.

(Atul Kumar Garg) Presiding Officer

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead