CGIT2 Delhi EPF matters Orders dated 21.05.2026 on 21 May 2026

M/s. D.S. Enterprises

. …. Appellant Through:- None for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram Central

…. Respondent Through:- Sh. Narender Kumar, ld. counsel for the respondent Order Dated:-21.05.2026

Registry has placed a copy of email received on the official email id of this tribunal from Sh. S.K. Khanna, ld. Counsel for the appellant mentioning his unavailability and requesting him to grant an adjournment today citing that he has to leave for Chandigarh to attend urgent family matter.

In the present case, the application for condonation of delay was allowed by this tribunal on 07.05.2026 and the matter is listed for argument on the prayer seeking stay. The trial court record which was ordered to be returned on the last date is handed over to ld. Counsel for the respondent at his request. Let the matter be listed on 16.07.2026 for arguments on the prayer for stay. In the meanwhile, respondent is directed to file reply to this appeal within six weeks.

M/s. Shivalik Prints

. …. Appellant Through:- Sh. J.R. Sharma & Sh. Bhupesh Sharma, ld. counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Faridabad

…. Respondent Through:- Ms. Neeru, clerk of Sh. B.B. Pradhan, ld. counsel for the respondent Order Dated:-21.05.2026

Ms. Neeru, clerk of Sh. B. B. Pradhan, ld. Counsel for the respondent stated that the counsel is attending a hearing before Delhi High Court and is unable to appear today before this tribunal. It is directed to list the matter on 29.05.2026 and both the parties are required to remain present on that day. It is made clear that no adjournment shall be allowed on the next date of hearing and matter shall be heard and decided on basis of the record on that day.

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT No. 2/EPFAT, DELHI

D-2/25/2024 M/s Seasons Textiles vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida.

Present: Sh. Haribansh manav, ld. Counsel for the appellant.

Ms. Santwana Agarwal, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Shailendra Arya,

A/R for the respondent.

Order dated-21.05.2026

Ld. Counsel for the appellant submitted that his written submissions are already on record and he is adopting the same for the sake of oral arguments. He also submitted two case laws and a circular in support of his arguments. Heard the ld. Counsel for respondent. The matter is reserved for pronouncement of order.

Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2 DELHI;

M/s. Akasva Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

.…. Appellant Through:- Sh. Yash, proxy Counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram

…. Respondent Through:- None for the respondent Order Dated:-21.05.2026

Proxy counsel appearing for the appellant requested for an adjournment stating that main counsel Sh. S.K. Gupta is unable to appear today as he is at Bangaluru. In the interest of justice, adjournment granted. List the matter on 16.07.2026 for final arguments.

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2 DELHI; Appeal No. D-2/01/2025 M/s. Chennai MSW Pvt. Ltd.

.…. Appellant Through:- Sh. Ravi Ranjan Mishra, ld. Counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida

…. Respondent Through:- Ms. Santwana Agarwal, ld. counsel & Sh. Shailendra Arya, A/R for the respondent Order Dated:-21.05.2026

Final arguments in the matter heard at length and concluded. The A/R for the respondent has brought the trial court record but he is unable to place on record the copy of complaint on whose basis the enquiry was started. He further submitted that his office has intimated him that this is not the complete record and he shall place the complete trial court record along with copy of the complaint within a week. The trial court record brought today is retained with a direction to file the remaining record within a week. Matter is reserved for pronouncement of order.

M/s. Shreya Construction

.…. Appellant Through:- None for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Meerut

…. Respondent Through:- Sh. Narender Kumar & Sh. Anirudh Kumar, ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated:-21.05.2026

Office has placed a request for adjournment received through email sent by Sh. Prakash Kumar expressing his inability to attend the hearing today. In the interest of justice, adjournment is granted. List the matter on 20.07.2026 for final arguments.