CGIT2 Delhi EPF matters Orders dated 12.05.2026 on 12 May 2026

Item no. 1 D-2/02/2026 M/s S.D. Enterprises vs. APFC/RPFC, Meerut.

Present: Sh. Prakash Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.

Sh. Shyam Vihar, AR for the respondent.

Order dated-12.05.2026

AR for the respondent has reported that his counsel is busy in Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. He has filed the reply to the application for condonation of delay along with photocopy of the trial court record.

Record perused. Application for condonation of delay has already been disposed of, so, there is no use in filing the reply of the application today. Hence, reply filed by the AR for the respondent is struck off from the record.

He submits that he will file the replies to the application of appellant seeking stay of execution of the impugned order and the application under section 7(O) of the EPF & MP Act, 1952, after consulting from the main counsel.

Put up for 26.05.2026 for filing the replies of the said application.

Item no. 2 D-2/20/2025 M/s Launch My Career Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC-II, RO Noida and Ors.

Present: Sh. Prakash Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.

None for the respondent.

Order dated-12.05.2026

Office has reported that a FDR amounting to Rs. 11,99,145/- has been prepared and kept in the file as directed by this Tribunal vide order dated 28.04.2026. As the appellant has complied with the direction passed by this Tribunal, there shall be stay on execution of the impugned order till finalization of the appeal.

Respondent is required to file the reply of the appeal. Since, the respondent’s counsel is not present today, last and final opportunity is given to the respondent’s counsel for filing the reply of the appeal. Put up for 26.05.2026.

Item no. 3 D-2/33/2022 M/s OYO Hotels & Homes Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurgaon.

Present: Sh. Anil Bhatt, KK Pandey & Ashish Kumar Ojha, Prakash Kumar,

Ld. Counsels for the appellant.

Argument heard in part. On perusal of the impugned order reveals that it has not specifically mentioned as to what basis the respondent has assessed the amount on special allowance w.e.f. 01.11.2016, and how many employees have been getting the said amount i.e. special allowance.

Respondent’s counsel submits that he will make the clarification after requisitioning the trial court record.

Let the trial court record be called. Put up for 14.07.2026. A copy of this order is sent to the RPFC through mail.

Item no. 4 D-2/09/2023 M/s Oravel Stays Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram East.

Present: Sh. Anil Bhatt, KK Pandey & Ashish Kumar Ojha, Prakash Kumar,

Ld. Counsels for the appellant.

Ld. Counsel for the respondent submitted that this case be separated from appeal no. D-2/33/2022 titled as M/s OYO Hotels & Homes Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurgaon, as facts of both these cases are distinct and required separate consideration. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has no objection to it.

At joint request, this case is adjourned to 28.07.2026 for final argument.

Item no. 5 D-2/39/2022 M/s Sudhir Power Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC-II, Gurugram-2.

Present: Sh. Umesh Gulati, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.

At joint request, this case is adjourned to 14.07.2026 for the further argument at 2 PM.

Item no. 6 D-2/32/2024 M/s Akasva Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram.

Present: None for the appellant.

Sh. Devank Dutta, Proxy Counsel alongwith Sh. Manjeet Jhakar,

AR for the respondent.

Order dated-12.05.2026

At the request of the proxy counsel of the respondent, this case is adjourned to 21.05.2026 for final argument.