Central Government Industrial Tribunal

ID No. 113/2018 titled as Sh. Neeraj Kumar vs Central Translation Beureau on 28 April 2026

Sh. Neeraj Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Central Translation Bureau & Anr.

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI - 1,

NEW DELHI.

ID No.113/2018

Sh. Neeraj Kumar Bhardwaj, R/o H.No. 123, Mohalla Uprahi, Mahipalpur, New Delhi-110037.

…Claimant

Versus

1. Central Translation Bureau, Rajbhasha Vibhag, Grih Mantralaya, Paryavaran Bhawan, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003.

2. M/s Snowbell Facilities Services Pvt.Ltd., A-135, Arjun Nagar, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi-110029 …Management

AWARD

1. In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter No-L-42012/73/2017 (IR(DU)) dated 30.01.2018 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under: The Schedule ‘Whether the services of Sh. Neeraj Kumar Bhardwaj who was employed w.e.f. October 2010 till April 2016 have been terminated illegally and / or unjustifiably by the establishment of Central Translation Bureau and if so, what relief the workman is entitled to and what directions are necessary in this regard?’

Page 1 of 2

Sh. Neeraj Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Central Translation Bureau & Anr.

2. In the endorsement made in reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the parties raising the dispute to file statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within fifteen days of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

3. On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workman as well as the managements. In pursuance to the notice issued, parties appeared and some proceedings had been recorded. Thereafter, the claimant stopped appearing despite several adjournments. It seemed that the claimant is not interested in pursuing its case anymore.

4. In these circumstances, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a ‘No Dispute/Claim’ award. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.

Date: 28.04.2026

Ajay Kumar Jain

Presiding Officer

CGIT – cum – Labour Court-I, Delhi

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead