Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. vs PROMPT ENGINEERS & ORS. on 13 October 2026

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

NEW DELHI

Dated:

13/10/2026

CYBER APPEAL/7/2024

WITH

MISC APPLICATION/164/2025

WITH

MISC APPLICATION/146/2025

WITH

MISC APPLICATION/165/2025

Appellant Name:

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.

Versus

Respondent Name: Prompt Engineers & Ors.

BEFORE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRUBHAI NARANBHAI PATEL, CHAIRPERSON

HON'BLE DR. SANJEEV BANZAL ,MEMBER

For Applicants/Appellants/

Petitioners Advocate

Ms. Diptiman AcharyaMr. Samarth Mehrotra For Respondents Advocate Mr. Vibhav SrivastavaMs. Aashi Arora( For R1 & R2);Mr. Kush Sharma Mr. Anmol Gupta ( For R3).

ORDER

Page 1 of 3

1. MA 146/2025: This Miscellaneous Application has been preferred by original appellant for condonation of delay of 135 days. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that there is typographical error in this Miscellaneous Application and wrongly it has been mentioned that there is delay of 105 days but, in fact, as per accurate calculation, the delay of 135 days has to be condoned.

2. Having heard the learned counsels for both sides and looking to the reasons stated in this Miscellaneous Application especially in paragraph nos. 3,4 and 5, there are reasonable reasons for condonation of delay. We, therefore, condone the delay in preferring this Cyber Appeal. We, hereby, allow and dispose of this Miscellaneous Application.

3. MA 164/2025: Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has submitted that the purpose of filing of this Miscellaneous Application has been achieved and hence, applicant (original appellant ) is not pressing this Miscellaneous Application at this stage. This Miscellaneous Application is he reby and allowed and disposed of.

4. MA 165/2025: This Miscellaneous Application has been preferred by original appellant seeking stay of the impugned order.

5. We have already granted stay of operation, execution and implementation of impugned order vide order dated 27.05.2025 which is conditional upon deposition of the amount. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the amount as per the order of this Tribunal has been deposited before Registrar of this Tribunal.

Page 2 of 3

6. We have already granted the stay which shall remain in operation during the pendency of the final hearing of this Cyber Appeal . In view of these observations, this Miscellaneous Application is hereby allowed and disposed of .

7. Registry is directed to enlist this Cyber Appeal under the heading " For Hearing" on 08.01.2027.

8. This matter will be heard along with the CA 3/2024.

9. Parties to this litigation are permitted to file their written submissions on or before next date of hearing.

( JUSTICE D. N. PATEL)CHAIRPERSON

( DR. SANJEEV BANZAL)MEMBER

/AS/

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead