EPF matters order dated 15.04.2026 CGIT-2 Delhi. on 15 April 2026

Item no.- 1

D-2/08/2026 M/s Shreya Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram.

Present: Sh. Saumya Bajaj, Ld. Counsel for the appellant. Sh. B.B Pradhan, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.

Order dated-15.04.2026

AR for the respondent is instructed by the department to appear in this case through mobile phone. However, when he tried to contact after seeing the pendency of this case from Gurugram, no effective representation was made.

Record perused. On 06.04.2026, when this matter has come up for hearing, nobody had represented the respondent despite being aware of the pendency of this appeal. This court had ordered to pass the status-quo in respect of the amount freezed by the bank. The trial court record was also ordered to be summoned, however, compliance has not been made.

Let the trial court record be summoned on 21.04.2026. In the meanwhile, status-quo order to be maintained in respect of the amount freezed.

Item no.- 2

D-2/19/2025 M/s Shree Durga Sugar Factory vs. APFC/RPFC-II, Meerut.

Present: Ms. Veena Chaudhary, Proxy Counsel for the appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.

Order dated-15.04.2026

Respondent has filed the reply to the appeal. Copy furnished to the appellant’s counsel. Appellant has filed the compliance of the order dated 30.10.2025 and furnished the FD to the tune of Rs.4,28,010/- (Rs. Four Lakh Twenty Thousand Ten Only). With these, there is a stay of the impugned order till the finalization of the appeal

Let the matter be listed for filing of rejoinder, if any, on 11.05.2026.

Item no.- 3

D-2/12/2025 M/s Shreya Construction vs. APFC/RPFC, Meerut.

Present: Ms. Veena Chaudhary, Proxy Counsel for the appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.

Order dated-15.04.2026

Reply to the appeal has already been filed by the respondent’s counsel. Copy has also been furnished to the appellant’s counsel.

Let the matter be listed for filing of rejoinder, if any, on 11.05.2026.

Item no.- 4

D-2/17/2025 M/s Varada Exports vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida.

Present: Ms. Veena Chaudhary, Proxy Counsel for the appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.

Order dated-15.04.2026

Respondent’s counsel submits that he has filed the reply, however, reply is not record. He submits that, in case the reply has not been filed, he would file the same within a week. He is also directed to supply the same to the appellant’s counsel before the next date of hearing.

Let the matter be listed for filing of rejoinder, if any, on 11.05.2026.

Item no.- 5

D-2/09/2022 M/s Xcelserv Solution Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram.

Present: Sh. Rajkumar, Proxy Counsel for Sh. S.K Gupta (main counsel) for the appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel along with Sh. Lalit Kumar, AR for the respondent.

Order dated-15.04.2026

Since the main counsel is not available today for argument. Let the matter be listed on 28.04.2026 for the same purpose.

Last opportunity is given to the counsel of the appellant to argue the matter.

Item no.- 6

D-2/33/2022 M/s OYO Hotels & Homes Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram.

Present: Sh. K.K. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the appellant. Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel alongwith Sh. Manjeet Jhakar, AR for the respondent.

Order dated-15.04.2026

Matter is listed for further argument; however, at joint request, this case be listed for 12.05.2026 for further argument.

Item no.- 7

D-2/09/2023 M/s Oravel Stays Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram East.

Present: Sh. K.K. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the appellant. Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel alongwith Sh. Manjeet Jhakar, for the respondent.

Order dated-15.04.2026

Record perused. Matter is listed for further argument; however, Appellant’s counsel seeks adjournment for inspection of the pendrive. He is at liberty to move the application for inspection of the pendrive then this Tribunal will decide whether he is given the copy of the pendrive after opening the seal and recording of the hash value of the pendrive.

Let this case be listed for 12.05.2026 for further argument.

Item no.- 8

D-2/32/2024 M/s Akasva Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram.

Present: Sh. Rajkumar, Proxy Counsel for Sh. S.K Gupta (main counsel) for the appellant. Sh. Prakhar Pushp, Proxy Counsel for the respondent.

Order dated-15.04.2026

Since both the parties seek an adjournment, let this matter be listed for arguments on 12.05.2026.

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT No. 2/EPFAT, DELHI

Item no.- 9

D-2/11/2025 M/s Nutech Jetting Equipments India Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Faridabad.

Present: Sh. Bhupesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the appellant. Sh. B.B Pradhan, Ld. Counsel along with Sh. Devesh, AR for the respondent.

Order dated-15.04.2026

Counsel for the appellant submits that he has not received the reply of the appeal yet.

Counsel for the respondent submits that he will file the same today and supply the copy to the appellant’s counsel. Though, according to the respondent, reply was ready on 13.10.2025, yet, the same could not be served. Let he is given liberty to file the same today, otherwise, right to file the reply would be closed.

Let this matter be listed for final argument on 15.05.2026. In the meanwhile, appellant is at liberty to file the rejoinder within two weeks with direction to supply the same to the respondent’s counsel.

At 3:20 PM-

Counsel for the respondent Sh. B.B Pradhan has filed the reply. Copy furnished to the appellant’s counsel.