Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal
BINODAN DIGITAL PVT. LTD. vs ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LTD on 29 September 2026
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
NEW DELHI
Dated:
29/09/2026
BROADCASTING PETITION/186/2024
Petitioner Name:
Binodan Digital Pvt. Ltd.
Versus
Respondent Name: Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM, MEMBER
For Applicants/Appellants/
Petitioners Advocate
Mr Himanshu DhawanMr Abhay Dev Sharma
For Respondents Advocate
Ms Aanchal Tandon, Ms Niharika Sharma, Mr Tarun Mehta
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. Case taken up. Learned Counsel for both side are present.
2. As per Office report, issues have not been framed, and parties have made their endorsement for not leading any evidence. Rather, date of hearing has been fixed. Hence, apparently, parties are not at any issues to be adjudged, nor there is any evidence to be led by either side, for proving their case or reply.
3. The only question with regard to ad interim order is being pressed, for which the mention by Learned Counsel for Petitioner is of making compliance of the interim order, and the affidavit of this compliance by Diary No. 2972 of 2026 has been filed. Copy has been served to other side.
4. Time is being requested for filing rebuttal/counter of it. Let, counter and rejoinder to this affidavit, after exchange in between, be got filed, within two weeks.
5. List the matter on 03.11.2026 "for further hearing over this alleged ad interim order."
( JUSTICE RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM)MEMBER
/NC/