Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

AXIS BANK vs KRISHNA KUMAR KESHARWANI AND ANR on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Before SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI, Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi TA I{o.782 OF 2022

AXIS BANK LIMTTED VS KRISHAI{ KUMAR

KESHARWANI & ORS

Reserued on

: 18.08.2O26

Pronounced on : 06.10.2O26

Axis Bank Limited

Vs.

1. Krishan Kumar Kesharwani

2. Anju Keshri

-Applicant bank

- Defendants

Present:

Sh. Shubham Singh, Counsel appears for

applicant bank.

Defendants are expafte, since, 03.10.2024.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

FINAL ORDER

This original application has been filed by the applicant bank, on 01.05.2017 through Mr. Aman Deep Chugh, Aera Manager of the applicant bank, under Section 19 of the RDB Act, 1993 against the defendants for recovery of a sum of Rs.12,42,921/- together with cost, charges and pendentellite and future interest @24.00o/o from date of filing of this O.A. till the realization in full.

2. The brief facts of the case are that at the request of defendant nos.1 and 2, the applicant bank sanctioned a Home Loan facility of Rs.14,50,000/-, vide sanction letter dateC 09.04.2015 for purchase the property bearing Flat'No.l3 DDA LIG Flat BLK-CI 3'd FLR Pocket- 2 Sec-34 Rchini, New Delhi-110034 in the residential project developed by the D9J!i Development Authority' 9,)...

The defendants executed all necessary loaning documents on27.M.2015. To repayment of the aforesaid loan was to be secured by way of creation of security by mortgage/equitable mortgage of the subject propefi to be purchase by the defendants.

3. It is further submitted that the defendants enjoyed and utilized the Loan facilities, but failed to maintain the financial discipline and failed to repay the due amounts. The applicant bank requested the defendants to regularize the loan account by visits and letters, but there was no response from the defendants. The applicant bank served a legal notice dated 30.03.2017 to the defendants but failed to recover the same Thus, the present O.A.ff.A. is preferred by the applicant bank to recover its dues.

4. On notice by this Tribunal, defendants failed to put appearance at all, despite publication. Accordingly, the defendants were proceeded against exparte on

03. L0.2024.

5. The applicant bank has filed evidence by way of affidavit of Sh. Gyanendra Kumar, Chief Manager of the applicant bank as Annexure A- 1 to Annexure A-10, which have gone unchallenged and un-rebutted. Hence, the case of the applicant stands fully established against the defendants with respect to nonpayment of outstanding amount. a\

6. After perusing the records, this Tribunal is of the view that the applicant bank has proved its case beyond reasonable doubts. The evidence and documents filed by the applicant bank not rebutted by the defendants by not placing any evidence and there is no question of disbelieving the evidence and documents filed by the applicant bank based upon the written/printed documents. In the light of the above discussions, the present T.A. deserues to be allowed.

ORDER

1) I hereby allow this T.A. of the applicant bank and direct the defendant nos.1 and 2 to pay jointly and severally to the applicant bank within 30 days from today, a sum of Rs.12,42,9211- along with cost, expenses and interest @10.15olo from the date of filing of this O.A. which has become T.A till the date of realization.

2) In case of failure to deposit the above amount within the stipulated period, the same shall be recovered from the sale of mortgaged property bearing Flat No.13 DDA UG Flat BLK-CI 3'd FLR Pocket-2 Sec-34 Rohini, New Delhi-110034. In case of short fall, the same shall be recovered from the sale of personal movable and immovable assets of the defendant nos.1 and 2.

3) Recovery Certificate be issued forthwith and be sent to Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi. 9^

4) The registry of this Tribunal is hereby directed to issue free copy of the order and send the same to both the parties.

5) Parties are directed to appear before the Ld. Recovery Officer, DRT-II, Delhi on 07.L2.2026. Pending IAs, if any, stand disposed of. File be consigned to records. tI (susHr L rfNnn-dasrocr) Date : 06.10.2026 Date : 06.10.2026 PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi This judgement has been signed, dated and pronounced in open court. gi--.. (susHrL KUMAR i<AdrOCr) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead