ID No. 216/2015 titled as Sh. Satyawan & others vs The Director on 14 January 2026

1. In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter No-L-11011/20/2015(IR(M) dated 23.09.2015 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:

The Schedule ‘Whether termination of Sh. Satyawan S/o Sh. Karamchand & 07 others (List is in the application at sl. No.1 to 8) by the management of Kritivaas Logistics Pvt. Ltd. without complying the provisions of Section 25F, H & H of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is just, fair and legal? If not, what relief the workmen concerned are entitled to?’

Sh. Satyawan & ors. Vs. The Director, Kritivaas Logistics Pvt. Ltd.

2. In the endorsement made in reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the parties raising the dispute to file statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within fifteen days of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

3. On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workmen as well as the management. In pursuance to the notices sent, statement of claim was filed. Thereafter, none has appeared on behalf of the claimant. Thus, it is clear that the workman is not interested in adjudication of the reference on merits.

4. In these circumstances, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a ‘No Dispute/Claim’ award. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.

Date: 14.01.2026

Ajay Kumar Jain

Presiding Officer

CGIT – cum – Labour Court-I, Delhi