Central Government Industrial Tribunal
DID No. 296/2017 titled as Sh. Sandeep Dabas vs Airport Authority of India on 8 January 2026
THE
CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL
CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI - 1
ROOM NO.207, ROUSE AVENUE COURT COMPLEX, NEW DELHI.
DID No.296/2017
Shri Sandeep Dabas S/o Shri Surendra Singh Dabas, Through Hindustan &
General Mazdoor Union (Regd 4479), D-2/24, Sultanpuri, Delhi.
Claimant…
Versus
1. Airport Authority of India, Rajiv Ganshi Bhawan, New Delhi-110005.
2. M/s Delhi International Airport Ltd., New Udan Bhawan, Opp. ATS, IGI Airport, New Delhi-110037.
3. M/s Plasma Premium Launch, IGI Airport Terminal-3, New Delhi-110037.
4. M/s Machlin Engineering Ltd., Plot No.54/3A, Rama Road, New Delhi-110015.
5. M/s Uttam Uddan Tour and Travels, Terminal No.3, IGI Airport, New Delhi-110037.
Management…
AWARD
Present: None for the Claimant. Sh. Amit Bardhan, A/R for the Respondent/Management No.1. Sh. Digvijay Rai, A/R for the Respondent/Management No.2. None for the Respondent/Management No.3 to 5.
Page 1 of 2
Shri Sandeep Dabas Vs. Airport Authority of India and ors.
1. The present claim petition was filed by the claimant under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Briefly stated, the case of the claimant was to the following effect. The claimant was working on the post of Baggi Operator w.e.f. 01.12.2011 onwards. The respondents had illegally shown the employment of the claimant to be working through the contractor. The services of the claimant had been illegally terminated by the respondents. Through the present claim petition, the claimant had prayed that his termination order from service be set aside and he be reinstated in service with full back wages.
2. Respondents/managements No. 1 to 3 had contested the claim petition by filing written statements. No written statement by respondents/managements no.4 & 5. On the pleadings of the parties, requisite issues were framed and the case was fixed for the evidence of claimant. Thereafter, none has appeared on behalf of the claimant nor any evidence adduced on behalf of the claimant.
3. It appears that the claimant is not interested in pursuing his case.
4. Hence, this Tribunal has no option except to pass a ‘No Dispute/Claim’ award. I order accordingly. Case file be consigned to the Record Room.
5. A copy of this award be sent to the appropriate Government for notification under section 17 of the I.D. Act, 1947.
(Ajay Kumar Jain)
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Delhi-1 Date: 08.01.2026
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…