Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal

RAJ CABLE NETWORK on 9 October 2026

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

NEW DELHI

Dated:

09/10/2026

MISC APPLICATION/241/2026

IN

TELECOM PETITION/46/2022

Petitioner Name:

Tata Communications Limited

Versus

Respondent Name: Winmax Telecommunication India Pvt Ltd BEFORE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRUBHAI NARANBHAI PATEL, CHAIRPERSON

HON'BLE DR. SANJEEV BANZAL ,MEMBER

For Applicants/Appellants/

Petitioners Advocate

Ms. Kanishka Rawat

For Respondents Advocate

Mr. Himanshu Dhawan

ORDER

1. MA 241/2026: This Miscellaneous Application has been preferred by the original respondent mainly for the reason that the respondent wants to add the grounds for factual matrix of which is already mentioned in the reply.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent that no new facts are brought on record which are already mentioned in the reply. On this basis new grounds have been mentioned in this Miscellaneous Application which may be permitted to be agitated in the TP 46/2022.

3. Notice upon non-applicant (original petitioner). Learned counsel appearing for petitioner accepts notice and is seeking time to get instructions and to file reply.

4. Time to file reply in Miscellaneous Application is granted till next date of hearing.

5. Hence, the matter is adjourned on 11.1.2027.

( JUSTICE D. N. PATEL)CHAIRPERSON

( DR. SANJEEV BANZAL)MEMBER

/AS/

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead