Securities Appellate Tribunal

Arun Panchariya vs SEBI on 7 October 2026

IN THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT

MUMBAI

DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

CORAM : Justice P. S. Dinesh Kumar, Presiding Officer Ms. Meera Swarup, Technical Member Dr. Dheeraj Bhatnagar, Technical Member

Appeal No. 19 of 2023

And

Misc. Application No. 1605 of 2022

Between

Arun Panchariya

28, Woodlands Ride,

ASCOT SL5 9HN.

BERKSHIRE,

United Kingdom.

…. Appellant

By Mr. Sandeep Wadhawan, Advocate with Mr. Gurjot Singh, Advocate for the Appellant.

And

Securities and Exchange Board of India

SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G Block,

Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East),

Mumbai - 400 051.

…. Respondent

By Mr. Sumit Rai, Advocate with Ms. Nidhi Singh, Ms. Komal Shah, Mr. Arav Doss, Ms. Sanjana Kumari, Advocates i/b Vidhii Partners for the Respondent.

THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 15T OF SEBI

ACT, 1992 TO SET ASIDE ORDER DATED OCTOBER 22, 2021 (EX. A-1) PASSED BY THE WHOLE TIME

MEMBER, SEBI.

Page 1 of 4

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS 7TH

DAY OF OCTOBER 2026, THIS TRIBUNAL PASSED THE

FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

Per : Justice P. S. Dinesh Kumar, Presiding Officer (Oral)

This appeal is directed against order dated 22.10.2021, passed by the WTM1, SEBI2 directing the appellant to disgorge a sum of ₹23.06 Crore jointly and severally with other noticees, restraining the appellant from accessing the Indian securities market; and restraining him from holding any position as a Director or KMP3 in any listed public company or a public company intending to raise money from the public or any SEBI registered intermediary for a period of 10 years.

2. We have heard Mr. Sandeep Wadhawan, learned Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Sumit Rai, learned Advocate for the respondent-SEBI.

3. Mr. Sandeep Wadhawan, learned Advocate for the appellant submitted that the subject matter of this appeal is covered by this Tribunal’s order4 on disgorgement in Appeal No.21 of 2023. He further submitted that the order impugned in this appeal has been set aside by this Tribunal’s order in Appeal No.250 of 20225 qua certain noticees.

1 Whole Time Member 2 Securities and Exchange Board of India 3 Key Managerial Personnel 4 Arun Panchariya v. AO, SEBI, disposed of on 15.10.2025 by the Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai 5 Aspire Emerging Fund v. SEBI, disposed of on 27.09.2023, by the Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai.

Page 2 of 4

4. He submitted that only aspect which remains for consideration in this appeal is, the direction debarring the appellant from accessing the securities market and accepting/ holding any position as a KMP or a Director. He submitted that this Tribunal in Appeal No.542 of 2022 and connected cases, heard simultaneously has recorded appellant’s undertaking that he shall not access the securities market in India nor hold any position as a Director or a KMP in any listed company and disposed of those appeals.

5. Mr. Sumit Rai, learned Advocate for the respondent- SEBI does not dispute the fact that SEBI’s direction to disgorge a sum of Rs.23.06 Crores jointly and severally by Arun Panchariya, Vintage FZE, Highblue Sky Emerging Market Fund and Aspire Emerging Fund has been set aside by this Tribunal in Appeal No.250 of 2022 qua certain noticees including appellant and therefore, the only point which remains for consideration is appellant’s debarment.

6. We may record that in a similar case, except for the direction for disgorgement, in Appeal No.542 of 2022, we have accepted Arun Panchariya’s undertaking that he shall not access the Indian securities market and also not accept any position as a KMP or a Director in any listed company in India and disposed of those appeals. Arun Panchariya appeared through video conference, admitted the contents of the affidavit dated 19.03.2025 and undertook to abide by them. He was duly identified by his advocate Mr. Sandeep Wadhawan. The undertaking contained in the affidavit reads as follows :-

Page 3 of 4

“5. That be that as it may, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the appellant in the above said appeals against the debarment and restraint orders, the appellant categorically undertakes that he shall not access the Indian Securities Market; shall not buy or sell or otherwise deal in any securities related to the Indian Securities Market and shall not hold any position as a Director or Key Managerial personnel in any listed company of Republic of India or intermediatory registered with the SEBI during the period of the above said orders.

6. That the above said undertaking of the appellant is only restricted to the Indian Securities Market and shall not have any effect on the Overseas Securities Markets of other countries.”

7. In view of the above, this appeal is disposed of by recording the above undertaking of Arun Panchariya reserving liberty to the SEBI to approach this Tribunal in the event of any breach of the undertaking. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

No costs.

Justice P. S. Dinesh Kumar Presiding Officer

Ms. Meera Swarup Technical Member

Dr. Dheeraj Bhatnagar Technical Member 07.10.2026 PTM

MRS PRAMILA Digitally signed by MRS PRAMILA Date: 2026.10.13 16:19:57 +05'30'

Page 4 of 4

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead