EPF matters order dated 05.12.2025 CGIT-1 Delhi except item no. 1 & 7 of the cause list which are already uploaded separately. on 5 December 2025

Item No.2 D-1/03/2025 M/s. PCI Limited vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi North Present: Ms. Vijaya, proxy counsel for the appellant.

Ms. Sania, proxy counsel for the Respondent.

Order dated- 05.12.2025

As regular counsels for both the parties are not present, put up the matter on 10.02.2026 for arguments on stay application. In the meanwhile, interim orders to continue till next date of hearing.

Item No.3 & 4 D-1/47/2024 & D-1/48/2024 M/s. Jagriti Public School vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi South Present: Sh. Nikhil Patnaik, ld. Counsel for the appellant.

Sh. B.B. Pradhan, ld. Counsel & Ms. Hemlata, A/R for the

Respondent.

Order dated- 05.12.2025

Arguments on the misc. application filed under Section 7 O of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 heard and concluded. The trial court record consisting of two files is produced by the A/R for respondent and the same is retained along with the case file.

Perusal of the record reveals that the complaint on which this enquiry was started is not available in the trial court record. The AR is directed to look for the compliant in the record of her office and file the same within next three days.

Matter is reserved for pronouncement of order on the misc. application filed u/s 7O of the Act. A copy of this order be placed in both the files.

Item No.5 D-1/12/2024 M/s. Alpha manpower Services vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East Present: Sh. Prakash Kumar, ld. Counsel for the appellant.

Sh. Narender Kumar, ld. Counsel & Sh. Sunil Ranjan, A/R for

Today the case is listed for filing of rejoinder by ld. Counsel for the appellant. The same stands filed after supplying a copy to ld. Counsel for the respondent. Pleadings in the matter are complete. Put up the case on 23.03.2026 for filing arguments.

Item No.6 D-1/15/2025 M/s. Assotech Limited vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East Present: Sh. Prakash Kumar, ld. Counsel for the appellant.

Sh. S.N. Mahanta, ld. Counsel & Sh. Sunil Ranjan, A/R for

Today the case is listed for filing of rejoinder by ld. Counsel for the appellant. However, more time of one week is sought by him. Let the matter be listed for completion of pleadings before the registrar on 15.12.2025. Thereafter, matter be placed before the tribunal on 23.03.2026 for final arguments.

Item No.8 354(4)2013 Harish Sahni & Shashi Sahni vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi Present: Sh. A.K. Tiwari, ld. Counsel for Harish Sahni. Sh. Ashish Negi, Ld. Counsel for Shashi Sahni

Sh. S.N. Mahanta, ld. Counsel & Ms. Hem Lata, A/R for

Sh. Ashish Negi submitted his Vakalatnama on behalf of Shashi Sahni and requested for some time to go through the records. In the interest of justice, prayer to grant time is allowed. Put up the case on 16.01.2026 for final arguments.

Item No.9 568(4)2016 M/s. Janheet Food Safety Foundation vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi South Present: Sh. R.K. Verma, A/R for the appellant.

Sh. Narender Kumar, ld. Counsel & Sh. Vikas Kumar, A/R for

The A/R appearing for appellant requested for an adjournment stating that his counsel Sh. Puneet Saini could not appear today due to demise of his mother. In the interest of justice, adjournment granted. Put up the case on 23.01.2026 for final arguments.

Item No.10 D-1/76/2019 M/s. Guru Solutions Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East Present: None for the appellant.

Sh. Narender Kumar, ld. Counsel & Sh. Sunil Ranjan, A/R for

Called up several times. None appeared on behalf of the appellant. Ld. Counsel along with the A/R remain present throughout the calls. Perusal of record reveals that notice sent to the appellant has returned with a remark ‘no such establishment is at this address, hence, returned’. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution on part of the appellant. Record of the appeal be consigned to record room after supplying a copy to the respondent.

Item No.11 D-1/27/2020 M/s. Ashiana Housing Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi South Present: Sh. Sanjay Kumar, ld. Counsel for the appellant.

Sh. B.B. Pradhan, ld. Counsel & Ms. Hemlata, A/R for

Counsel appearing for the appellant requested for an adjournment stating that the arguing counsel Sh. Rajiv Shukla is busy in arguments before Delhi High Court. In the interest of justice, adjournment granted. Put up on 05.02.2026 for final arguments.

Item No.12 D-1/49/2024 M/s. Bandana Electricals vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East Present: Sh. Sanjay Kumar, ld. Counsel for the appellant.

Sh. B.B. Pradhan, ld. Counsel & Ms. Hemlata, A/R for

Counsel appearing for the appellant requested for an adjournment stating that the arguing counsel Sh. Rajiv Shukla is busy in arguments before Delhi High Court. He further requested to list this case on 21.01.2026 when another matter of the present appellant is already posted for hearing. In the interest of justice, adjournment granted. Put up on 21.01.2026 for final arguments.