Central Government Industrial Tribunal
EPF matters order dated 01.12.2025 CGIT-2 Delhi. on 1 December 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Item No. 1 D-2/24/2024 M/s. Balaji Associates vs. APFC, Faridabad Present: Sh. Raj Kumar, Proxy for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-01.12.2025
Vide separate order passed, appeal is partly allowed. Copy of the order be sent to both the parties through email. File be consigned to the record room.
Item No. 2 D-2/07/2025 M/s. Ambience Hotel & Resorts Pvt. Ltd vs. APFC/ RPFC, Gurugram East Present: Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-01.12.2025
Appellant has placed on record the demand draft worth Rs. 9,07,906/- in compliance of the order dated 16.09.2025 passed by this tribunal. The same is taken on record and directed to be deposited in the bank. With this, the interim stay passed by this tribunal becomes excluded.
Appellant has also made a prayer through an application that new AR Ms. Bhawna Singh be substituted as AR in place of previous AR. In support of the plea, he has placed on record the certified copy of the resolution passed by the Board of Directors appointing Ms. Bhawna Singh as AR. The resolution is taken on record and Ms. Bhawna Singh is substituted as new AR. ,
Put up for filing of reply on 14.01.2026 with direction to supply the advance copy to the opposite party.
Item No. 3 D-2/27/2021 M/s DLF Golf Resorts LTD. vs. RPFC –Gurugram (East Present: Sh. Vinod Kumar, A/R for the Appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Sarfaraz, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-01.12.2025
AR for the appellant submits that the mother of the main counsel has expired and, therefore, he seeks adjournment. On the other hand, respondent has drawn the attention of the Tribunal towards Page- 32 of the appeal wherein the appellant establishment has accepted the dues.
Let the matter be fixed for filing of written arguments. Put up for 14.01.2026.
Item No. 4 D-2/09/2022 M/s Xcelserv Solution Pvt. Ltd. vs. RPFC, Gurugram Present: Sh. Raj Kumar, Proxy for the Appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Lalit Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-01.12.2025
Appellant has moved an application seeking adjournment stating that main counsel is busy in CGIT, Dhanbad in the appeal of Tata Steel. Let it be listed for 12.01.2026. In the meanwhile, LCR produced by the respondent consisting of three volumes and two CDs is retained.
Item No. 5 & 6 D-2/02/2024 & D-2/03/2024 M/s. Cadence Design Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd vs. RPFC-I, Noida Present: Sh. S.K. Khanna, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-01.12.2025
Part argument heard. Respondent submits that he will file the bifurcation in case of the domestic workers as well as international workers. Let it be fixed for further argument on 19.12.2025. A copy of this order is placed in each of the files.