EPF matters order dated 25.11.2025 CGIT-1 Delhi on 25 November 2025

Item no. 1 D-1/46/2023 M/s. SMS Paryavaran Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi (North)

Present: Ms. Sonali Madan, Proxy for the Appellant. Sh. Sagar Kumar, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Mahendra Meena, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-25.11.2025

Since the appellant counsel is not available today as his mother is unwell, let it be listed for 14.01.2026. Till then, interim order is continued.

Item no. 2 D-1/44/2023 M/s. Sumitra International. vs. APFC, Delhi (West)

Present: None for the Appellant. Ms. Swati Surhatia, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-25.11.2025 Record perused. The appeal has been filed assailing the order passed by the respondent u/s 7A of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred as the Act) wherein amount has been assessed by the respondent to the tune of Rs.15,41,379/- as PF dues. On 19.09.2025, application u/s 7O of the Act was disposed off directing the appellant to deposit an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- within six weeks from the date of order by way of FDR favouring ‘Registrar CGIT’ as a condition of pre- deposit as mandated under Section 7O of the Act. Instead of complying, the order in letter hand spirit, appellant had moved a misc. application seeking time for deposit of balance amount after making the part compliance of Rs.3,02,000/- by way of FDR which was not found in terms of order dated 19.09.2025 and the same was returned to him for complying the order dated 19.09.2025 till today. However, no compliance has been made by the appellant. Since the appellant has failed to comply with the condition imposed by this tribunal which is mandated u/s 7O of the Act for entertainment of the appeal, this appeal stands dismissed on non- compliance. Respondent is at liberty to execute the order and recover the amount as per rules. Office is directed to consign the record to the record room. Sd/-

Item no. 3 873(4)2015 Multiserve India Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC, Delhi Present: Ms. Trisha, Proxy for the Appellant. Ms. Swati Surhatia, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-25.11.2025

As the main counsel for the appellant is not available today, let it be fixed for final argument on 13.01.2026.

Item no. 4 1077(4)2015 Jai Balaji Security Services. vs. APFC, Delhi(N)

Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Mahendra Kumar Meena, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-25.11.2025

As the main counsel for both the parties are not available today, let it be fixed for final argument on 23.02.2026.

At 3pm, At this stage, Sh. Sanjay Agarwal, Counsel for the Respondent appeared and noted the next date of hearing.

Item no. 5 D-1/09/2018 M/s. Perfact Computer Forms Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC, Delhi (South)

Present: None for the Appellant. Ms. Swati Surhatia, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-25.11.2025

Fresh authority letter filed by respondent. Since the matter has come up for hearing after 11.03.2025, the matter is listed for 23.02.2026. In the meanwhile, let notice be issued to the appellant through email for the purpose of advancing of argument.

Item no. 6 D-1/23/2021 M/s. Global Hunt India Pvt. Ltd vs. APFC, Delhi East Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-25.11.2025

Record perused. This matter has been adjourned en-bloc since 17.07.2023 and no progress has been made since then. Let the case be listed for final argument on 24.02.2026. In the meanwhile, let notice be issued to the appellant through email.

Item no. 7 D-1/06/2024 M/s. Capital Builders; vs. APFC, Delhi Central Present: Ms. Trisha, Proxy for the Appellant. Sh. Kuldeep Singh, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-25.11.2025

As the main counsel for both the parties are not available today, let it be fixed for final argument on 24.02.2026.