EPF matters order dated 20.11.2025 CGIT-1 Delhi except item no. 1 of the cause list which is already uploaded separately. on 20 November 2025

D-1/26/2025 M/s. Prehari Cyber Security and Facilities Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi North Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Appellant seeks time to deposit the amount in compliance of the order dated 18.09.2025. He submits that he was unable to contact the client. For this reason, he seeks three weeks’ time. Put up for 17.12.2025 for compliance as well as filing of reply to the appeal by the respondent. Interim order is continued till next date.

D-1/36/2025 M/s Anand & Company. vs. APFC/ RPFC, Delhi Central Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Appellant submits that the matter would be listed in a week in the Delhi High Court.

Record perused. This tribunal had passed an order on 12.09.2025 directing the appellant to pay interest component assessed by the respondent authority as a condition for stay on execution of the impugned orders in this appeal, however, till today the amount has not been deposited by the appellant.

In these circumstances, interim stay passed by this tribunal stands vacated. Reply to the appeal is already on record. Copy supplied. Put up for filing of rejoinder on 17.12.2025.

204(4)2011 Maharaja Aggarsen Public School. vs. APFC, Delhi Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, proxy Counsel (for Sh. Rajiv Arora) for the Appellant. Sh. B.B. Pradhan, proxy Counsel (for Sh. K.K. Jha) for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Since main counsels for both the parties are not available, let it be fixed for 25.02.2026 for final arguments.

1024(4)2014 AN Traders. vs. APFC, Delhi

Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Satpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Appellant counsel is already discharged in the present case on the last date of hearing. Respondent has not furnished any information whether the appellant establishment has paid any PF contribution till date. However, it is important to mention here that notice was sent for abundant caution to the appellant through email after obtaining information from the respondent. Despite this, nobody has appeared.

Considering the above said facts, it appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Respondent is at liberty to execute. File be consigned to record room.

1283(4)2014 Redson Tea Ltd. vs. APFC, Delhi

Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, proxy Counsel (for Sh. Rajiv Arora) for the Appellant. Sh. D.R. Rao, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Sunil Ranjan, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Since main counsel for appellant is not available, let it be fixed for 25.02.2026 for final arguments.

729(4)2015 Saraswati Construction Comp. vs. APFC, Delhi (N)

Present: Sh. Vishal Arun, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Manu Parashar, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Sandeep, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Respondent seeks time to argue the matter stating that he is the newly engaged counsel in this matter and has to obtain the copy of the reply filed by the department. Put up for final argument on 02.03.2026.

867(4)2015 Ambitious Pens Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC, Delhi Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, proxy Counsel (For Sh. Rajiv Arora) for the Appellant. Sh. Manu Parashar, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Since main counsel for appellant is not available, let it be fixed for 26.02.2026 for final arguments.

740(4)2016 S.R.Tailors. vs. APFC, Delhi (N)

Present: Ms. Ashu Goyal, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. D.R. Rao, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Both the parties had already filed their written submissions. Let it be fixed for oral argument on 22.12.2025.

755(4)2016 S.S. Engineering Works. vs. APFC, Delhi (S)

Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Arvind Kumar Verma, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Ld. counsel for the respondent submits that he has to argue in a case in CBI Court today. For this reason, he seeks adjournment. Also, this case has come up for hearing after a long time.

In these circumstances, let the matter be adjourned for final argument on 14.01.2026. Let the appellant be given notice through email informing the next date of hearing.

33(4)2017 Amil Pharmaceutical vs. APFC, Delhi (N)

Present: Sh. Gurmeher, Proxy for the Appellant. Sh. Prakhar, Proxy for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Since main counsel for both the parties are not available, let it be fixed for 02.03.2026 for final arguments.

234(4)2017 Sky Lark Security. vs. APFC, Delhi (N)

Present: Sh. Rameshwar Singh, A/R for the Appellant. Sh. Chakradhar Panda, Ld. Counsel & Ms. Hemlata, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Since main counsel for appellant is not available, let it be fixed for 02.03.2026 for final arguments.

D-1/03/2019 M/s Toshali Resort International. vs. APFC, Delhi (South)

Present: Sh. Vishal Arun, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Swati Surhatia, Ld. Counsel & Ms. Hemlata, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

As fresh authority letter is filed by respondent, let the case be listed for final arguments on 02.03.2026.

D-1/26/2019 M/s. Multiserve India Pvt. Ltd. vs. M/s. Multiserve India Pvt. Ltd.

Present: Sh. Rakesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Swati Surhatia, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Sandeep, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Respondent seeks time to file reply to the appeal. Respondent is directed to file reply within six weeks and supply advance copy. Appellant is further directed to file rejoinder within six weeks and supply advance copy. Put up for final argument on 03.03.2026. Respondent is further directed to bring trial court record.

D-1/37/2019 M/s. Rosmerta HSRP Ventures Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC, Delhi(West)

Present: Sh. Ashish Kumar Ojha, Proxy for the Appellant. Sh. Manu Parashar, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Sandeep, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Since main counsel for appellant is not available, let it be fixed for 26.02.2026 for final arguments.

D-1/86/2019 M/s. Seasons Furnishings Ltd. vs. APFC, Delhi(East)

Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Case called up several times, none appeared on behalf of the appellant. Ld. Counsel for the respondent is present throughout the calls. Accordingly, the matter is dismissed in default due to non- prosecution on behalf of the appellant. Record be consigned to the record room.

D-1/119/2019 M/s. Golden Edge Engineering Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC, Delhi(South)

Present: Sh. Harvansh Manav, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel & Ms. Hemlata, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Appellant filed written submissions. Copy supplied. Put up for 03.03.2026. In the meanwhile, respondent is at liberty to file written submissions.

D-1/32/2020 M/s. Dusseldorf India Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC, Delhi(South)

Present: Sh. Abirat Kumar, Proxy for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

As fresh authority letter is filed by the respondent and the matter has come up for hearing after a long time, let this case be listed for 03.03.2026 for oral arguments.

D-1/36/2020 M/s. Nice International Limited. vs. APFC, Delhi (Central)

Present: Sh. Pradeep Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Respondent has filed an application with the prayer to amend memo of parties as the jurisdiction of RPFC has been changed from Regional Office Delhi South to Regional Office Delhi Central. Considering the formal nature of the application, application stands allowed. Since this appeal has come up on board after a long time, the case is listed for final argument on 05.03.2025.

D-1/34/2021 M/s. State Council of Educational Research and Training. vs. 1. CBT through CPFC; 2. APFC, Delhi East

Present: Sh. Rajiv Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Sunil Ranjan, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Part argument heard. Put up for further argument on 22.12.2025.

D-1/40/2021 M/s Pranciscan (Franciscan) Sisters Trust. vs. APFC, Delhi (South Present: Sh. Puneet Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Vijay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Part argument heard. Put up for further argument on 09.01.2026. Respondent is further directed to bring clarifications on the grounds enumerated as E,F,G, & H in the appeal.

D-1/60/2022 M/s. United Coffee House. vs. APFC, Delhi(C)

Present: Sh. Rajiv Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Kanhaiya Singhal, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Respondent counsel seeks three weeks’ time for filing of Annexure R1 which has been mentioned in his reply. Put up for 09.01.2026.

D-1/33/2024 M/s Food Corporation of India. vs. APFC/ RPFC, Delhi Central Present: Sh. Rajiv Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Rajshekhar Awasthi, Proxy for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Since the main counsel for the respondent is not available, the matter is listed for 27.01.2026 for final arguments.

D-1/73/2019 M/s. Nice International Limited. vs. RPFC-II, Delhi (Central)

Present: Sh. Pradeep Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-20.11.2025

Respondent has filed an application with the prayer to amend memo of parties as the jurisdiction of RPFC has been changed from Regional Office Delhi South to Regional Office Delhi Central. Considering the formal nature of the application, application stands allowed. Since this appeal has come up on board after a long time, the case is listed for final argument on 05.03.2025.