Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK vs M/S CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE on 22 January 2026
Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Delhi
4th floor, Jeevan Tara Building,
Parliament Street, New Delhi
Presiding Officer: Shri Govind Ballabh Sharma T.A. No. 1501 of 2022
Punjab National Bank
Circle Sastra East Delhi, First floor
CSC, E-Block, Mayur Vihar Phase II,
New Delhi-110091
Versus
• M/s Centre of Excellence
Through its Proprietor
Ms. Navita Sharma
Flat no.124, GF, Sector 28
Gautam Budh Nagar,
Noida, Uttar Pradesh-201301
Also at:
M/s Centre of Excellence
A-18, Sector A-3
Tronica City, Ghaziabad, UP-201001
Also at:
M/s Centre of Excellence
[472, Duplex, Radha Kunj, Brij Vihar
Ghaziabad, UP-201001
Applicant
Defendant
Present: Shri Naman Shukla, Counsel for the applicant bank Date of Reserve: 05.01.2026
Date of Pronouncement: 22.01.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
FINAL ORDER
This original application has been filed by the applicant bank on 13.06.2018 before DRT-III Delhi and then transferred to DRT-I, Delhi under Section 19 of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 against the defendant for recovery of a sum of Rs.45,22,839.75 (Rupees Forty Five Lacs Twenty two Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty Nine and paisa Seventy Five only) as on 11.06.2018 alongwith future interest @11.25% in Cash Credit account and @11.75% in Term Loan account with monthly rests from the date of filing of this application till the date of its realization and costs. The defendant also agreed to pay penal interest @2% per annum in case of default or delay in repayment.
2. The brief facts of the case are that on the request of the defendant being sole proprietorship concern of Ms Navita Sharma in the business of manufacturing denim wear vide application dated 08.02.2025, the applicant bank sanctioned Cash Credit facility for Rs.40.00 Lacs (Rupees Forty lacs only) for working capital requirement and Term Loan of Rs.10.00 Lacs on 07.03.2015 against hypothecation of stocks, book debts and plant & machinery to be purchased covered under CGTMSE scheme.
3. That in order to avail the credit facility, the defendant submitted loan application and executed Term Loan Agreement PNB-0639, Agreement of Hypothecation of Movable Assets PNB-884, Hypothecation of Goods and Book Debts, Form No.PNB-222-788, Undertaking Declaration with the applicant bank on 07.03.2015.
4. The defendant acknowledged and executed Balance and Security Confirmation Letters dated 06.08.2016, 24.02.2017 and 03.01.2018 with the applicant bank.
5. It has been submitted by the applicant bank that after availing the loan facility, the defendant failed to comply with the terms and conditions of sanction and regularize the account with applicant bank. Ultimately, the applicant bank classified the account as NPA on 16.04.2018 as per RBI guidelines but defendant failed to regularize the account. Hence, the applicant bank approached this tribunal for recovery of their dues.
6. Notice under section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002 dated 23.05.2018 was issued to the defendant calling upon them to pay the entire outstanding dues with the applicant bank.
7. Notices of this O.A. were issued to the defendant and despite proper service the defendant has chosen to absent from the proceedings. As per order dated 27.09.2023, the defendant has been proceeded ex-parte as not appeared before the Tribunal nor written statement, evidence and affidavit of assets have been filed.
8. In order to prove its case, the applicant bank has filed various documents such as Loan application, Sanction Letter, Term Loan Agreement, Agreement for Hypothecation of Movable Assets, Hypothecation of Goods and Book Debts, Undertaking Declaration, Review Letters, Balance & Security Confirmation Letters, Notice u/s 13(2) of SARFAESI Act, Statement of Account and General Power of Attorney marked as from page no.1 to 92.
9. The applicant bank has fully corroborated the averments made in the O.A. Even otherwise the whole case of the applicant bank is based on the documents and the same have been duly proved. 5-C1-
10. The case filed by the applicant bank gone unrebutted and there is no question of disbelieving the case of the applicant bank and the applicant bank has proved its case beyond reasonable doubts.
11. In the light of the above discussions, the Original Application deserves to be allowed.
ORDER
I, allow this OA and direct the defendant to pay to the applicant bank within a period of 30 days a sum of Rs.45,22,839.75 (Rupees Forty Five Lacs Twenty Two Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty Nine and paisa Seventy Five only) as on 11.06.2018 along with pendentelite and future interest @11.75% per annum with monthly rests from the date of filing of this application till its realization with costs; failing which the aforesaid amount shall be recovered from the sale of hypothecated stocks, book debts and plant & machinery etc. In case of shortfall, the same shall be recovered from the sale of movable and immovable properties of the defendant. (II) The recovery certificate be issued forthwith and be sent to the Recovery Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Delhi. (III) Parties are directed to appear before Recovery Officer, DRT I, De:hi on 23.03.2026. (IV) Copies of final order as well as Recovery Certificate be sent to all concerned free of cost.
)-6 (GOVIND BALLABH SHARMA) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-I, DELHI (Dictated and pronounced in open court) Dated: 22.01.2026 c sd