Securities Appellate Tribunal

NARENDRA SINGH THAKUR vs PANEL OF RECOVERY OFFICERS, SECURITIES EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA on 12 October 2026

IN THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT

MUMBAI

DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

CORAM : Justice P. S. Dinesh Kumar, Presiding Officer Ms. Meera Swarup, Technical Member Dr. Dheeraj Bhatnagar, Technical Member

Appeal No. 347 of 2026

And

Misc. Application No. 926 of 2026

And

Misc. Application No. 927 of 2026

Between

Narendra Singh Thakur

Village – Marbodi,

Tehsil & District Seoni,

Madhya Pradesh – 480 882.

…. Appellant

By Mr. Jaydeep Singh Bais, Advocate with Mr. Shivendra Singh Sisodiya, Advocate for the Appellant.

And

Securities and Exchange Board of India

Through its Panel of Recovery Officers

SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G Block,

Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East),

Mumbai - 400 051.

…. Respondent

By Mr. Mihir Mody, Advocate with Mr. Vijay Chockalingam, Mr. Aavish Shetty, Mr. Sudhanshuman Naruka, Mr. Vignesh Narayanan, Advocates i/b. M/s. K. Ashar & Co. for the Respondent.

Page 1 of 3

THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 15T OF SEBI

ACT, 1992 TO SET ASIDE ORDER DATED AUGUST 24, 2026 (EX-A) PASSED BY RECOVERY OFFICER, SEBI.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS 12TH

DAY OF OCTOBER 2026, THIS TRIBUNAL PASSED THE

FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

Per : Justice P. S. Dinesh Kumar, Presiding Officer (Oral)

At the outset, Mr. Mihir Mody, learned Advocate for the respondent - SEBI raised a preliminary objection that the properties in question has not been attached in the Justice (Retd.) R. M. Lodha Committee proceedings.

2. Mr. Shivendra Singh Sisodiya, learned Advocate for the appellant submitted that appellant would be satisfied if Mr. Mody’s submission is placed on record and the matter is disposed of.

3. Mr. Mody, on instructions, reaffirms that the properties mentioned in paragraph No. 24 of the impugned order and listed herein below have not been attached in the proceedings before Justice (Retd.) R. M. Lodha Committee.

“Properties comprised in Khasra No. 687 (0.40 hectares) and Khasra No. 690/2 (1.82 hectares), total admeasuring 2.22 hectares situated at Village Marbodi, Bandol Tehsil, District Seoni, Madhya Pradesh.”

Page 2 of 3

4. Nothing further survives in this appeal. The appeal is disposed of by placing the submission of the learned Advocate for the respondent on record.

5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

No costs.

Justice P.S. Dinesh Kumar Presiding Officer

Ms. Meera Swarup Technical Member

Dr. Dheeraj Bhatnagar Technical Member 12.10.2026 VPM MRS PRAMILA Digitally signed by MRS PRAMILA Date: 2026.10.15 15:09:12 +05'30'

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead