EPF matters order dated 18.11.2025 CGIT-1 Delhi except item no. 1, 2, 6 & 8 which are already uploaded separately. on 18 November 2025

161(4)2013 Jadli Foods India Pvt. Ltd vs. APFC, Delhi Present: Sh. Rajiv Arora, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Niranjan Das, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-18.11.2025

Part argument heard. Put up for further argument on 02.03.2026. Appellant is at liberty to place on record documents on which he wants to rely.

67(4)2016 Relief Equipment Co. vs. APFC, Delhi

Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Satpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-18.11.2025

Record perused. Notice was issued to the appellant but none has appeared on behalf of the appellant despite several calls. Record further reveals that since 19.10.2022 nobody has been appearing and pursuing this appeal.

Considering the above facts, it appears that appellant is not interested in contesting the appeal. Hence, appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Respondent is at liberty to execute recovery. Copy of this order be sent to the respondent by email.

247(4)2014 G4S Secure Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC, Delhi Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Yash Narayan, Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-18.11.2025

Called up several times it is already 03:30 P.M. None appeared on behalf of the appellant. Counsel of the respondent remain present throughout the call who has submitted that he has received the amount impugned in this appeal. It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution by and on behalf of the appellant. Office is directed to consign the record to the record room.

596(4)2016 Viraj Enterprises. vs. APFC, Delhi (S)

Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Hemlata, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-18.11.2025

As the respondent counsel is not available today, case is listed for 25.02.2026.

D-1/43/2019 M/s. Kochhar Impex Private Limited vs. APFC, Delhi (Central)

Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Avnish for Sh. Ajay Vikram Singh, Ld. Counsel & Ms. Hemlata, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-18.11.2025

Record perused. Notice was issued to the appellant but none has appeared on behalf of the appellant despite several calls. Record further reveals that since last several dates nobody has been appearing and pursuing this appeal.

Considering the above facts, it appears that appellant is not interested in contesting the appeal. Hence, appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Respondent is at liberty to execute recovery. Copy of this order be sent to the respondent by mail.

D-1/45/2019 M/s. Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited,. vs. RPFC, Delhi (Central)

Present: Sh. Akash Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. D.R. Rao, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-18.11.2025

Respondent wants to inspect the court file. He is at liberty to do the same. Let it be fixed for final argument on 25.02.2026.

D-1/46/2019 M/s. G.A. Digital Web Word (P) Ltd. vs. RPFC-I Delhi (East)

Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-18.11.2025

Record perused. Notice was issued to the appellant but none has appeared on behalf of the appellant despite several calls. Record further reveals that since 27.09.2022 nobody has been appearing and pursuing this appeal.

Considering the above facts, it appears that appellant is not interested in contesting the appeal. Hence, appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Respondent is at liberty to execute recovery. Copy of this order be sent to the respondent by mail.

D-1/47/2019 M/s. G.A. Digital Web Word (P) Ltd. vs. RPFC-I Delhi (East)

Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-18.11.2025

Record perused. Notice was issued to the appellant but none has appeared on behalf of the appellant despite several calls. Record further reveals that since 27.09.2022 nobody has been appearing and pursuing this appeal.

Considering the above facts, it appears that appellant is not interested in contesting the appeal. Hence, appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Respondent is at liberty to execute recovery. Copy of this order be sent to the respondent by mail.

D-1/28/2022, D-1/29/2022, D-1/30/2022 M/s NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL vs. RPFC, Delhi (Central)

Present: Sh. Kaustubh Punj, Proxy for the Appellant. Sh. Pradeep Kumar Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-18.11.2025

These are the three cases filed by the appellant against the order passed u/s 7A of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 for different periods. Since the main counsel for appellant is unavailable today and fresh authority letter is filed by the respondent today, these cases are listed for 26.02.2026. A copy of this order is placed in each of the files.

D-1/18/2023 M/s. D D Motors vs. APFC, Delhi (West)

Present: Sh. Rajiv Arora, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Swaleha Siddiqui, Proxy Counsel & Sh. Sandeep, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-18.11.2025

As the main counsel for the respondent is not available, let it be listed for 02.03.2026. Interim order is continued.

D-1/01/2025 M/s. Pragmatic Educational Society; vs. APFC/ RPFC, Delhi North Present: Sh. Prakash Kumar & Sh. Girjesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Sandeep, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-18.11.2025

Part argument heard. Put up for further argument on 23.02.2026.