Central Government Industrial Tribunal

Cgit-1 Delhi order dated 18.11.2025 Appeal no. D-1/46/2025 M/s. Cobra Instalaciones Y Sevicious vs APFC on 18 November 2025

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM

LABOUR COURT, NEW DELHI

Counsels:

For Appellant:- Sh. Abhishek Diwakar, ld. counsel.

For Respondent:- Ms. Santwana Aggarwal, ld. counsel & Ms. Hemlata, A/R.

Order Dated:-18.11.2025

ORAL

1. Appellant has pressed his application for stay. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has stated that he has filed the present appeal assailing the orders dated 30.09.2025 passed by the respondent, whereby respondent has assessed the damages and interest to the tune of Rs.66,64,174/- & Rs.32,46,906/- under section 14 B & 7Q of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred as the Act) for the period 01/2015 to 03/2024. It is his case that the recovery of the said amount will cause irreparable injury and hardship to the appellant, who is already under financial distress due to Covid-19 related disruptions and ongoing losses. He further stated that the balance of convenience also lies in favour of the appellant. Therefore, he prayed operation of the impugned order be stayed till final disposal of the appeal.

2. The Respondent has filed the reply of the application opposing the stay application. He has submitted that the financial constraint is not a justifiable ground to escape statutory liability. Hence, the application be dismissed.

3. I have heard the argument at par and perused the record. Appellant has taken the plea of financial difficulty due to covid-19. For this he has also

Page 1 of 2

relied upon the documents from page 30 which is the balance sheet. On perusal of the balance sheet as on March 31, 2018 turnover of the appellant is around Rs.1,805,078,698/- (Rupees One Hundred Eighty Crore Fifty lakh Seventy-Eight Thousand Six Hundred Ninety-Eight only). So far so as on March 31, 2019 is concerned it was around more than rupees Two hundred crores. The payment which has to be paid to the PF department is hardly in lakhs. Therefore, the financial difficulty cannot be taken into Consideration.

4. Since the appeal is at admission stage and detail argument is required to be heard in respect of the plea taken by the appellant, operation of the impugned order is stayed subject to the condition of depositing Rs.50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Lakh Only) including the interest amount of Rs.32,46,906 by way of FDR favoring ‘Registrar CGIT’ initially for a period of one year having auto renewal mode thereafter, within four weeks from today. Put up on 06.01.2026 for reporting compliance by the appellant and filing of reply of the main appeal by the respondent. In the meanwhile, interim order to continue till next date of hearing. Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead