Central Government Industrial Tribunal
EPF matters order dated 17.11.2025 CGIT-2 Delhi. on 17 November 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
D-2/27/2021 M/s DLF Golf Resorts LTD. vs. RPFC –Gurugram (East)
Present: Sh. Puneet Saini, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Narendra Kumar, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Yudhvir Singh, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-17.11.2025
Argument has been heard. Original record of 7A has been placed. Appellant submits that he be given time for filing of written argument. Let it be filed within 15 days. Put up for argument on 01.12.2025.
D-2/02/2024 M/s. Cadence Design Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. RPFC-I, Noida Present: Sh. S.K. Khanna, Ld. Counsel for the appellant. Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order dated- 17.11.2025 Part arguments have been heard. He stated that the EDLI scheme, 1976 is applicable to the international workers only upon the ceiling limit of Rs. 15000/-, while the assessment has been done by the RPFC ignoring this fact. He further submitted that the matter had been remanded back. However, the RPFC again calculated the dues on the basis of the same five allowances from which the appellant seeks exemption. He also submitted that the order doesn’t reveal any bifurcation of basic wages and allowances. The respondent is directed to place on record the bifurcation of salary in respect of domestic workers as well as international workers on which the order has been passed. Let this matter be listed on 01.12.2025 for further arguments.
D-2/03/2024 M/s. Cadence Design Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. RPFC-I, Noida Present: Sh. S.K. Khanna, Ld. Counsel for the appellant. Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order dated- 17.11.2025 Part arguments have been heard. He stated that the EDLI scheme, 1976 is applicable to the international workers only upon the ceiling limit of Rs. 15000/-, while the assessment has been done by the RPFC ignoring this fact. He further submitted that the matter had been remanded back. However, the RPFC again calculated the dues on the basis of the same five allowances from which the appellant seeks exemption. He also submitted that the order doesn’t reveal any bifurcation of basic wages and allowances. The respondent is directed to place on record the bifurcation of salary in respect of domestic workers as well as international workers on which the order has been passed. Let this matter be listed on 01.12.2025 for further arguments.