Central Government Industrial Tribunal

EPF matters order dated 11.11.2025 CGIT-2 Delhi. on 11 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

D-2/10/2025 M/s. FMI Automotive Components Pvt. Ltd. Vs. APFC/RPFC Gurugram West Present: Sh. Ashish Ojha, proxy counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. counsel & Sh. Lalit Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-11.11.2025

The counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has moved an application seeking extension of time to deposit the amount stating that he has received the order dated 12.09.2025 for reporting compliance on 06.11.2025.

However, it is a matter of fact that oral order was passed on the very same date and the appellant was very well aware about the order. Considering the above fact, the appellant is given time to deposit the amount within ten days subject to a cost of Rs. Two Thousand Only to be deposited in the account of ‘Registrar CGIT’. Put up on 27.11.2025. Interim orders to continue till then.

808(14)2016 & D-2/32/2019 M/s. Viraj Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. APFC/RPFC Noida Present: Sh. Rajiv Arora, ld. counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. counsel & Sh. Gurpreet Singh, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-11.11.2025

Final arguments in the matter heard in part. Put up on 05.12.2025 for remaining arguments.

D-2/09/2022 M/s. Xcelserv Solution Pvt. Ltd. Vs. APFC/RPFC Gurugram Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Lalit Kumar A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-11.11.2025

Respondent has brought the complete trial court record. Since, the counsel for the appellant has filed an application through email seeking adjournment due to his pre-occupation in Mumbai CGIT, let this matter be listed for final hearing on 01.12.2025. Respondent is directed to bring the TCR again on that date.

D-2/32/2024 M/s. Akasva Infrastructure Pvt. ltd. Vs. APFC/RPFC Gurugram Present: None for the Appellant. Ms. Kirti, proxy (For Sh. B.K. tamber, ld. counsel & Md. Sarfaraz Alam, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-11.11.2025

Since, the counsel for the appellant has filed an application seeking adjournment through email due to his pre-occupation in Mumbai CGIT, let this matter be listed for final hearing on 27.11.2025.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead