Central Government Industrial Tribunal
Sh. Inder Kumar & Ors vs C.P.W.D. & Ors on 24 November 2025
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDSUTRIAL TRIBUNAL – CUM –
LABOUR COURT-II, DELHI
I.D. NO. 257/2022
Sh. Inder Kumar & 11 Ors.
Through- The President Sh. Hukum Chand,
CPWD Karamchari Union, Babu Lal Ji Complex, Shop No.-04, Gurgaon Road, Opposite Bus Stand, Gurgaon, Haryana-122001.
VERSUS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Director General, Central Public Work Department, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110001.
2. The Director of Personal, P.W.D., 11th Floor, MSO Building (P.W.D. H.Q.) I.T.O, New Delhi-110002.
3. Work Cum T.L.Q. (A), Special Director of General, Project & Chandigarh, CPWD kendriya Sadan Chandigarh-160009.
4. PWD Secretary, 11th Floor, MSO Building (P.W.D.H.Q.), I.T.O, New Delhi-110002.
AWARD 24.11.2025
1. This is an application U/s 33-A of the Industrial Disputes Act (here in after is referred as an Act) filed by the claimants. Their names and particulars are given below-
Name Date of Joining Joining Division office Present Division Office Sub Division Office
Jitender 02.02.2002 P.W.D Circle no. II M-113 S.W.R.I C.E.M.Z-IS
Sushil Kumar 17.03.1995 School Building Project Mandel M-214(P.W.D.) M-214
Sanjeev Sharma 12.06.1995 S.R.D M-21
Rajesh Sharma 01.12.1999 Delhi College
Jai Prakash Dubey 31.07.2003 S.R.D.(E) P.W.D office
Anil Kumar 31.12.2008 E.IN.C M313-3 (PWD) E.I.M.C.
Shammi Ram 16.06.2007 D.C. College Project M-333 C.F.M.A (III)(N)
Chhote Lal 13.07.1992 ED-II P.W.D Shiksha Mandel-II Shiksha Mandel-II, Dwarka
Rajesh Kumar 01.12.1911 Delhi College
Prabhu 01.11.2012 P.W.D. M-14 E.D. (P.W.D.) E.D.U. (M) P.W.D
Hasan 31.01.2008 M-25 S.R.D. (E) E.IN.C P.W.D
All the workmen had joined into the employer of the management from their respective date of appointed as mentioned in the table herein above. Their dispute regarding regularization of their services is pending. After receiving the notice from the Conciliation, management started misbehaving with the workmen and threatening them to terminate from their services which is an illegal act of retaliation and shows that managements are annoyed due to pending dispute. Hence, they filed the application under section 33-A of the Act with the prayed that management be directed not to terminate the services of the workmen during the pendency of the subject dispute.
2. All the Managements have already been proceeded ex-parte on 10.04.2023.
3. Now, the matter is listed for ex-parte workman evidence. On 23.01.2025, claimants were directed to furnish the details of the main dispute of the present application, as nothing in this regard was mentioned in the claim statement. However, neither claimants nor AR have been appearing for a long time.
5. In these circumstances, when claimants are not interested in perusing their case, this tribunal has no option but to dismiss their application. Hence, application under section 33-A of the Act stands dismissed. Award is passed accordingly. A copy of this award is sent to appropriate government for notification under section 17 of the I.D. Act. File is consigned to record room.
ATUL KUMAR GARG
(Presiding Officer)