Central Government Industrial Tribunal

EPF matters order dated 07.11.2025 CGIT-2 Delhi. on 7 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

D-2/26/2021 M/s. Convergys India Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. RPFC, Gurugram Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the appellant. Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel along with Sh. Lalit Kumar, Authorized Representative for the Respondent.

Order dated- 07.11.2025 The Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed a brief notes of arguments, a copy of which has been supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the respondent. The respondent’s counsel has submitted that he will also file his written submissions shortly. Accordingly, the matter is listed for final arguments on 20.11.2025.

D-2/36/2022 M/s. IPSAA Holding Pvt. Ltd. vs. RPFC, Gurugram (East) Present: Sh. Ashwini Singh, proxy for the appellant.

Sh. Chakradhar Panda, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.

Order dated- 07.11.2025 The matter is listed today for final arguments. However, the proxy counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has sought an adjournment on the ground of absence of his senior counsel. In view of the said request, the matter is adjourned to 20.11.2025 for the same purpose.

D-2/19/2024 M/s. ATC Tower Company India Pvt. Ltd. vs. RPFC, Gurugram (East) Present: None for the appellant. Sh. Lokesh Yadav, Authorized Representative for the Respondent.

Order dated- 07.11.2025 The office has placed before the undersigned an adjournment request submitted by Sh. Toofan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the appellant. Written submissions on behalf of the appellant are already on record. Though, there is no need for further arguments, one more opportunity is granted to the Ld. Counsel for the appellant to advance oral arguments on 20.11.2025.

At 03:40 PM Sh. Vinod Kumar, proxy counsel for the appellant has submitted that he has been instructed by his senior to convey that written notes of arguments are already on record, and he doesn’t wish to make any further submissions.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead