Central Government Industrial Tribunal

EPF matters order dated 30.10.2025 CGIT-1 Delhi. on 30 October 2025

D-1/83/2024 M/s. Lakshmi Vatika Ltd. vs. APFC/ RPFC, Delhi Central Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Rahul, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-30.10.2025

Vide separate order pronounced by this tribunal, application for condonation of stay stands dismissed. Subsequent thereto, appeal also stands dismissed. Let a copy of this order be sent to both the parties through email. File be consigned to record room.

Page 1 of 9

D-1/41/2020 M/s. Pitambara’s Transport Services. vs. APFC, Delhi(East)

Present: Sh. Sachin Agarwal, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-30.10.2025

Respondent has furnished the copy of the reply to the appellant. Appellant is directed to file rejoinder within four weeks and supply advance copy to the opposite party. Let the matter be listed for final argument on 14.01.2026.

D-1/42/2023 M/s. Ujjawal Enterprises. vs. RPFC, Delhi North.

Present: Sh. Sachin Agarwal, Proxy Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Santwana Agarwal, Ld. Counsel & Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-30.10.2025

Since the main counsel for the appellant is not available due to sudden demise of his relative, let the matter be fixed for 17.12.2025.

Page 2 of 9

D-1/53/2024 M/s. Pitambara’s Transport Services. vs. 1. APFC/ RPFC, Delhi East 2.

Present: Sh. Sachin Agarwal, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-30.10.2025

Appellant counsel is directed to inspect the Trial court record brought by the respondent so as to ascertain the deposit made by him. Put up for 19.11.2025.

Page 3 of 9

D-1/47/2025 M/s Municipal Corporation of Delhi, vs. RPFC-II, RO Delhi (North)

Present: Sh. Yash Jain, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Kavya Dixit, Proxy Counsel & Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-30.10.2025

Fresh authority letter is filed by the respondent. Appeal is within time. Copy is supplied. Put up for filing of reply to the stay application as well as the main appeal on 15.01.2026. Till then, no coercive action be taken.

Page 4 of 9

501(4)2016 Security Cum Detective Services, vs. APFC, Delhi (S)

Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-30.10.2025

Called up several times. None appeared on behalf of the appellant, however, A/R for the respondent remain present throughout the calls. Perusal of the record reveals that the office has served the notice to the appellant despite this, the appellant chose to remain absent. In these circumstances, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution by and on behalf of the appellant. Office is directed to consign the record to the record room.

589(4)2016 Veer Arjun Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC, Delhi (N).

Present: Sh. Sachin Agarwal, Proxy Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Santwana Agarwal, Ld. Counsel & Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-30.10.2025

Since the main counsel for the appellant is not available due to sudden demise of his relative, let the matter be fixed for 15.01.2026.

1009(4)2016 R.D.Public School, vs. APFC, Delhi (N)

Present: Sh. Neeraj Kumar, Proxy Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-30.10.2025

Proxy for appellant submits that main counsel is unable to contact the client. Respondent main counsel is also not available today. Let the matter be fixed for 18.12.2025.

Page 5 of 9

179(4)2017 Haryana Security Placement, vs. APFC, Delhi (N)

Present: Sh. Anil Kumar Pathak, Director for the Appellant. Sh. Anuj Sharma, Ld. Counsel & Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-30.10.2025

Respondent counsel submits that he is unable to trace his authority letter, though, he has been representing the respondent for the last two years. Copy of the written argument is supplied to the respondent today from record. Put up for argument on 18.12.2025.

Page 6 of 9

D-1/18/2017 Isha Natural Beauty Product & Wellness Pvt. Ltd., vs. APFC, Delhi (N)

Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-30.10.2025

Called up several times. None appeared on behalf of the appellant, however, A/R for the respondent remain present throughout the calls. Perusal of the record reveals that the office has served the notice to the appellant despite this, the appellant chose to remain absent. In these circumstances, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution by and on behalf of the appellant. Office is directed to consign the record to the record room.

D-1/01/2021 M/s. Ridings Consulting Engineers India Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC, Delhi(North)

Present: Sh. Sachin Agarwal, Proxy Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel & Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-30.10.2025

Since the main counsel for the appellant is not available due to sudden demise of his relative, let the matter be fixed for 15.01.2026.

D-1/03/2021 M/s. Ridings Consulting Engineers India Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC, Delhi(North)

Present: Sh. Sachin Agarwal, Proxy Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel & Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-30.10.2025

Since the main counsel for the appellant is not available due to sudden demise of his relative, let the matter be fixed for 15.01.2026.

D-1/17/2022 M/s Seasons Furnishings Ltd., vs. RPFC, Delhi (East)

Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-30.10.2025

Record perused. This case has been adjourned enbloc since 27.03.2023. Let notice be issued to the appellant. Put up for 19.01.2026.

Page 7 of 9

D-1/25/2022 M/s Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. RPFC-II Delhi (East)

Present: Ms. Rajeshwari Mitra, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-30.10.2025

Appellant has assured that she will supply copy of the written submissions to the respondent within week. Respondent counsel is directed to file the authority letter. Put up for argument on 19.01.2026.

Page 8 of 9

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 1 DELHI

Item No. 15 D-1/27/2022 M/s IRCON International Ltd. vs. RPFC-1, Delhi (W).

Present: Sh. Suman Doval, Ld. Counsel for the appellant. Sh. Chirag Jainwal, Ld. Counsel along with Ashutosh Kumar Singh, AR for the respondent-1.

Order Dated-30.10.2025

Part arguments heard on behalf of the appellant’s counsel. Put up for further argument on 31.10.2025.

D-1/35/2023 M/s TDI Infrastructure Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC Delhi (Central)

Present: Sh. Aniket, Proxy Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-30.10.2025

Since the main counsel for the appellant is not available due to sudden demise of his relative, let the matter be fixed for 15.01.2026.

Page 9 of 9

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead