EPF matters order dated 27.10.2025 CGIT-1 Delhi. on 27 October 2025

D-1/29/2020 M/s Vodafone Idea Ltd. vs. RPFC-II, EPFO, RO Delhi (East).

Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Mail from the office of the respondent has been submitted by the ld. Counsel for the respondent. Let respondent be directed to produce documents pertaining to deposit of money from the account of appellant establishment along with copy of challan. Put up for 02.12.2025. A copy of this order be sent to the respondent.

D-1/23/2025 M/s Greenfields Public School vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi (East).

Present: Sh. S.K. Khanna, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Counsel for both the parties seeks adjournment. Let the case be fixed for 19.11.2025.

D-1/24/2025 M/s Greenfields Public School vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi (East).

Present: Sh. S.K. Khanna, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Counsel for both the parties seeks adjournment. Let the case be fixed for 19.11.2025.

D-1/ 40/2025 M/s Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. RPFC-I, RO Delhi (North)

Present: Sh. Yash Jain, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. K.K. Dey, Ld. Counsel & Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Reply to the misc. application for stay as well as the appeal has been filed. Copy is furnished. Put up for argument on stay on 19.11.2025.

D-1/ 42/2025 M/s Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. RPFC, RO Delhi (North)

Present: Sh. Yash Jain, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. K.K. Dey, Ld. Counsel & Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Reply to the misc. application for stay as well as the appeal has been filed. Copy is furnished. Put up for argument on stay on 19.11.2025.

D-1/ 44/2025 M/s Novex Pvt.Limited Vs. RPFC-I, RO Delhi (North)

Present: Sh. Sunil Choudhary & Sh. Praveen Singh, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel & Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

This is a fresh appeal filed by the Ex director of M/s Novex Pvt. Limited assailing an order dated 13.08.2025 passed by the respondent authority u/s 7A of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred as the Act) whereby an amount of Rs.38,36,732/- has been assessed as EPF dues for the period 06/2017 to 06/2019. Appellant has stated that the company M/s Novex Pvt.Limited has gone into liquidation and entire assets have been divided amongst the various stake holders. He further prayed that the EPF Authorities along with others have been given a notice, however, the claim filed twice by the EPF Authorities was rejected by the RP and the EPFO had not initiated any further legal proceedings either before the NCLT, NCLAT or any other legal forum. His further case is that the employees of the appellant establishment went to Delhi High Court by filing a writ and the writ petition was disposed off by the High Court giving directions to EPFO to look in the matter and dispose off the claim in accordance with the provision of EPF & MP Act, 1952. Upon the strength of this order passed by High Court, EPF Authority has initiated the enquiry and passed the impugned order.

Respondent counsel submits that the order has been passed in accordance with the law and in compliance of the direction by the High Court. Since, it is an order passed against a non-existing company and the account of the Ex director has been attached, therefore, the respondent authority not to take any further coercive action against the appellant herein till the further disposal of the misc. application filed u/s 7O of the Act.

Ld. Counsel for the respondent seeks some time to file the reply to this misc. application. Put up this case on 11.11.2025 for filing of reply to the said application and arguments on the same.

D-1/ 31/2024 M/s A S Construction vs. APFC/ RPFC, Delhi East Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Respondent submits that main counsel is not present today. Appellant submits that he has not complied the order passed by this court on 29.05.2025. Therefore, there shall be no stay on execution of the impugned order by the respondent authority and he is at liberty to execute the said order. Put up for filing of reply to the appeal on 17.11.2025.

D-1/ 29/2025 M/s Mahagun India Pvt. Ltd vs. APFC/ RPFC, Delhi East Present: Sh. Prakash Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Aakriti, Proxy Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Appellant seeks three weeks more time to deposit the amount as ordered by this court vide order dated 01.09.2025. Let it be fixed for 17.11.2025. Till then, interim order is continued.

778(4)2014 Swagath vs. RPFC, Delhi

Present: Ms. Snigdha Das, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Part argument heard. Put up for further argument on 13.11.2025. Trial court record produced is retained.

740(4)2016 S.R.Tailors vs. APFC, Delhi (N)

Present: Ms. Ashu Goyal, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. D.R. Rao, Ld. Counsel & Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Written arguments filed by respondent. Copy supplied. Put up for 20.11.2025 for final arguments.

762(4)2016 Krishna Facility Management Services vs. APFC, Delhi (S)

Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Ashutosh Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Record perused. This is an appeal filed u/s 14B & 7Q of the EPF & MP Act, 1952. On the first date of hearing, respondent was restrained to recover more than 30% of the assessed amount. Thereafter, matter was listed for final hearing after completing the pleadings. But for the last two dates, nobody has been appearing on behalf of the appellant in spite of serving with notice. It appears from the record that the appellant is not interested in pursuing this appeal. Therefore, appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Respondent is at liberty to execute the order. Record is consigned to the record to the record room.

D-1/06/2020 M/s Supreme Securities Ltd vs. RPFC-II, Delhi(North)

Present: Sh. S.K. Khanna, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Chakradhar Panda, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent (Vakalatnama Filed). Order Dated-27.10.2025

Fresh authority letter filed on behalf of the respondent. Since this matter has been adjourned en-bloc since 2023, let the matter be listed for hearing on 19.11.2025.

D-1/09/2020 M/s. IIMS Detective Pvt. Ltd vs. RPFC-II, Delhi (North Present: None for the Appellant. Ms. Santwana Agarwal, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Respondent counsel submits that she will file authority letter as she was assigned this case recently. Considering the fact that this matter is adjourned en-bloc since 07.12.2023, let the matter be listed for 13.11.2025. In the meanwhile, let notice be issued to the appellant.

D-1/14/2020 M/s. Lighton India Contractors Private Limited vs. CBT through RPFC-I, Delhi(West)

Present: Ms. Usha Nandini, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Santwana Agarwal, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Fresh authority letter filed by respondent. Considering the fact that this matter is adjourned en-bloc, let the matter be listed for final argument for 24.11.2025. In the meanwhile, let notice be issued to the appellant.

D-1/13/2022 M/s BSL Scaffolding Ltd. vs. APFC, Delhi (South Present: Ms. Anisha Arora, Proxy Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Ashutosh Singh, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Since the main counsels for both the parties are not present today, let this case be listed for final argument on 24.11.2025.

D-1/38/2023 M/s Wog Technologies Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi North.

Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Brijesh Kumar Tamber, Ld. Counsel &Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Appellant is directed to furnish balance sheet of the year showing heavy loses. Respondent counsel is directed to verify from the department whether the dues have been paid regularly since November 2021 by the appellant establishment. Put up for final argument on 11.11.2025.

D-1/12/2025 M/s. Vijay Power Generator Limited. vs. APFC/ RPFC Delhi East Present: Sh. Prakash Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Aakriti, Proxy Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Proxy counsel for the respondent seeks adjournment, let this case be listed for final argument on 24.11.2025.

D-1/13/2025 M/s. Takshila Public School Education Society. vs. APFC/ RPFC Delhi East Present: Sh. Prakash Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Tejasvi Doel, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-27.10.2025

Since the appellant counsel is not prepared today for argument, let the matter be listed for filing of rejoinder if any, and final argument on 24.11.2025.