Central Government Industrial Tribunal

EPF matters order dated 08.10.2025 CGIT-1 Delhi on 8 October 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

D-1/18/2023 M/s DD Motors vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi West.

Present: Sh. Rajeev Arora, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant.

Ms. Swaleha Siddiqui proxy for the Respondent. Order Dated-08.10.2025

Appellant stated that he has received the intimation from Sh. Sandeep Vishnu, ld. Counsel for the respondent about his unavailability due to emergency surgery of his wife. Office has also reported that the mail has been received from the respondent counsel to this Tribunal whereby adjournment has been sought by him on the same ground. Appellant counsel has confirmed that lien has been lifted in compliance of the order passed by this court on his account bearing no. 034102000002346. Put up for argument on stay application on 03.11.2025. In the meanwhile, interim order to continue till next date of hearing.

D-1/20/2025 M/s Mayo International School. Vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East.

Present: Sh. Prakash Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant.

Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-08.10.2025

Ld. counsel for the appellant has filed a FDR amounting to Rs.1,47,249/- (HDFC Bank) in compliance of the order dated 18.08.2025 order passed by this court on 18.08.2025. Copy of the FDR is supplied to ld. counsel for the respondent. Put up for filing of reply of this appeal on 14.11.2025. As the appellant has complied with the condition for granting stay, there shall be stay on recovery of the amount as mentioned in the impugned order till finalisation of the appeal.

D-1/75/2024 M/s Kee Pharma Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi North.

Present: Sh. Pranab Prakash, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant.

Sh. Narendra Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.

Order Dated-08.10.2025

This tribunal vide its order dated 17.07.2025 had directed the Appellant to deposit an amount of Rs.25,00,000/- by way of FDR as a condition for stay on recovery of the amount mentioned in the impugned order.

In par compliance of the said order dated 17.07.2025, Ld. Counsel for the appellant had deposited an FDR amounting to Rs.10,00,000/- on 11.09.2025 and had sought time till today for depositing the balance amount of Rs.15,00,000/-.

Today, ld. Counsel for the appellant has placed on record the FDR worth Rs.11,00,000/- and for the remaining amount of Rs.4,00,000/-, he has moved an application for reducing /exemption stating that appellant establishment is facing huge financial crisis and has managed to arrange for Rs.21,00,000/- only. Ld. Counsel for the respondent has objected the said application moved today.

Heard both the counsels and perused the record. Considering the fact that appellant has deposited the amount of Rs.21,00,000/- by way of two FDRs (Rs.10,00,000/- & Rs.15,00,000/-) and in the interest of justice which would be meet by hearing this appeal on merits only, appellant is exempted from depositing the balance amount of Rs.4,00,000/-. There shall be stay on execution of the impugned order till finalization of the appeal. Respondent counsel is directed to file the reply to this appeal within six weeks with direction to supply the advance copy to the opposite party. Thereafter, appellant is directed to file rejoinder within next four weeks with direction to supply the advance copy to the opposite party. Put up for 03.12.2025 for final argument.

D-1/42/2022 M/s Eaton Power Quality Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi South.

Present: Sh. Ravi Mishra, counsel for the Appellant.

Sh. Chakradhar Panda, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Ashutosh Kumar Singh, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-08.10.2025

Appellant seeks time to file rejoinder of the appeal. Put up for 14.11.2025.

D-1/04/2024 M/s G.K. Motel Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi South.

Present: Sh. Rajiv Arora proxy Counsel for the Appellant.

Sh. Chakradhar Panda, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Ashutosh Kumar Singh, A/R for the Respondent.

Order Dated-08.10.2025

Reply of the appeal is filed along with additional copy. As and when the main counsel of the appellant appears, the same shall be supplied to him. Put up for filing of rejoinder on 11.11.2025.

D-1/25/2024 M/s Patliputra Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East.

Present: Sh. Prakash Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant.

Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-08.10.2025

Appellant seeks adjournment for filing of rejoinder. Put up for 14.11.2025 with direction to supply advance copy to the opposite party.

161(4)2013 M/s Jadli Foods India Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi.

Present: Sh. Rajeev Arora, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant.

Sh. Niranjan Das, Ld. Counsel & Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-08.10.2025

Ld. Counsel for the appellant seeks an adjournment stating that the arguing counsel Sh. S.P. Arora is unable to appear today as he is not well. In the interest of justice, adjournment is granted. Put up on 11.11.2025.

405(4)2016 Mynah Design Vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi.

Present: Sh. Rajeev Arora, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant.

Sh. Chakradhar Panda, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Ashutosh Kumar Singh, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-08.10.2025

Ld. Counsel for the Respondent has to file the authority letter. For this, he seeks four weeks-time. Put up for 01.12.2025.

702(4)2016 Vishal International vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East.

Present: None for the Appellant.

Sh. Chakradhar Panda, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-08.10.2025

Record perused. The matter has been adjourned en-bloc since 23.03.2023. In these circumstances, let the case be adjourned for 12.01.2026. In the meanwhile, let notice be issued to the appellant.

178(4)2017 Kiwi Foods (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi North.

Present: Sh. Rajeev Arora Proxy for Sh. S.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant.

Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-08.10.2025

Earlier, one proxy for respondent appeared and submitted that main counsel is on the way. Even after half an hour, the counsel has not appeared. Moreover, proxy for appellant also seeks adjournment. Put up for 13.01.2026.

Later Sh. Ajay Vikram Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent appeared and noted the next date of hearing.

D-1/32/2018 M/s Six Dee Telecom Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi South.

Present: Sh. Rajeev Arora, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant.

Sh. Tejaswi Goel, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Ashutosh Kumar Singh, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-08.10.2025

Fresh authority letter has been filed by the respondent. This case has been recently assigned to the respondent counsel after the previous counsel Rajesh Kumar returned the file. Let the matter be adjourned for final argument for 08.01.2026.

D-1/13/2019 M/s Intarvo Technologies Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East.

Present: None for the Appellant.

Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R

for the Respondent. Order Dated-08.10.2025

Fresh authority letter has been filed by the respondent. Record perused. The matter has been adjourned en-bloc since 25.04.2022. In these circumstances, let the case be adjourned for 08.01.2026 for final arguments. In the meanwhile, let notice be issued to the appellant.

D-1/36/2019 M/s Advance Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East.

Present: Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Proxy for the Appellant.

Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R

for the Respondent. Order Dated-08.10.2025

Appellant submits that the arguing counsel Sh. Rajiv Shukla is not present today.

Record perused. The matter has been adjourned en-bloc since last several dates. In these circumstances, let the case be adjourned for 12.01.2026 for final arguments.

D-1/08/2020 M/s V5 Global Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East.

Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Chakradhar Panda, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-08.10.2025

Respondent submits that he will file authority letter by the next date of hearing as he is engaged recently in this case.

Record perused. The matter has been adjourned en-bloc since last several dates. In these circumstances, let the case be adjourned for 12.01.2026. In the meanwhile, let notice be issued to the appellant.

Later Sh. Krishan Kartik, Ld. Counsel for the appellant appeared on 10.10.2025 and noted the next date of hearing by putting his acknowledgment on the cause list.

D-1/26/2022 M/s Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi North.

Present: None for the Appellant.

Sh. Amit Verma, Ld. Counsel & Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated-08.10.2025

Office has reported that notice has not been sent to the appellant. Let fresh notice to appellant be issued through email. Put up for final argument on 13.01.2026.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead