Central Government Industrial Tribunal
ID No. 158/2019 Sh. Hira Ballabha vs Ashok Hotel on 7 October 2025
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI - 1,
NEW DELHI.
ID No. 158/2019
Sh. Hira Ballabh S/o Late Sh. Bhola Dutt, rept. by Sh. S.S. Upadhyay, president, Ashok Hotel, Mazdoor Janta Union, Ashok Hotel Staff Quarters, C-47, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi-110021.
…Claimant
Versus
The General Manager, Ashok Hotel, 50-b, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi-110021.
…Management
AWARD
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter No-L-42011/84/2019 IR(DU) dated 18.06.2019 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under: The Schedule ‘1. Whether the workman Sh. Hira Ballabh S/o Late Sh. Bhola Dutt, is entitled for promotion as DCP in the scale of9740-23870 w.e.f. 11.10.2018, in the establishment of Hotel Ashok, Chankyapuri, New Delhi, and if so what directions are necessary in this respect? 2. Whether the workman Sh. Hira Ballabh S/o Late Sh. Bhola Dutt, is entitled for 16 days salary which were deducted by the management against sanctioned leave for the year 2016-17? 3. What other relief the workman is entitled to?’
2. In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the parties raising the dispute to file statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties involved in the dispute. Claim statement was filed on behalf of the claimant.
3. Rebuttal written statement was also filed by the management. Evidence by way of affidavit on behalf of the claimant is also on record. Thereafter, even after serving with notice, none appeared on behalf of the claimant to substantiate his claim.
4. Hence, in these circumstances this tribunal has no option except to pass the no dispute award. No dispute award is passed accordingly. File is consigned to the record room. A copy of this award is hereby send to the appropriate government for notification under section 17 of the I.D. Act, 1947.
Date: 07.10.2025
ATUL KUMAR GARG
Presiding Officer
CGIT – cum – Labour Court – I