Allahabad High Court
A227/2258/2011 of SMT. BAIKUNTHI Vs SMT. MITHLESH CHAUDHARY AND OTHERS on 8 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2258 of 2011 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Learned counsel for petitioner states that the matter has become infructuous. 2. Writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. October 9, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2258 of 2011
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for petitioner states that the matter has become infructuous.
2. Writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. October 9, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Sahai Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Smt. Baikunthi .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Mithlesh Chaudhary And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad