Allahabad High Court
WPIL/2411/2026 of TITIKSH MISHRA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 8 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2411 of 2026 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. This petition purportedly in public interest has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to complete
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2411 of 2026
Chief Justice's Court
HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition purportedly in public interest has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to complete the construction of the CC road from Police Station, Utaraon passing by the house of Sandeep Kumar Mishra towards the house of Umesh Mishra in the Village Bhiura, Block Saidabad, Tehsil Handia, District Prayagraj.
2. Submissions have been made that a patch of road is not being constructed and, therefore, the respondents may be directed to do the needful.
3. A perusal of the record indicates that Annexure -4, spot inspection report prepared by the Engineer, Zila Panchayat, Prayagraj and Additional Engineer, Zila Panchayat, Prayagraj has noticed the fact that there is interim order granted by the competent court/authority on account of which the said construction has not taken place.
4. Once on account of grant of injunction by some authority, the respondents are not in a position to complete the construction, filing of PIL for the said purpose cannot be countenanced.
5. The remedy available for the petitioner in the circumstances is to get impleaded in the pending litigation, in case he has any locus in the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Kesarwani, Amit Pandey, Counsel for Respondent(s) : K.V. Singh (S.C.) Titiksh Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and 2 others .....Respondent(s)
pending litigation, in accordance with law and seek relief.
6. There is no substance in the petition, the same is, therefore, dismissed. October 9, 2026 RK/SL WPIL No. 2411 of 2026 2 (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad