Allahabad High Court
HABC/1338/2026 of NISHA BHARTI AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 8 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 1338 of 2026 Court No. - 42 HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J. HON'BLE ACHAL SACHDEV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State. 2. After filing the present writ petition, the subject matter of which was the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 1338 of 2026
Court No. - 42
HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J.
HON'BLE ACHAL SACHDEV, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State.
2. After filing the present writ petition, the subject matter of which was the disappearance of petitioner No.1, who went missing while on her way to her father's place, and as the missing person report had not yielded any result, the present writ petition came to be filed.
3. Pursuant to the filing of the present petition, a search was conducted, pursuant to which petitioner No.1, who is the wife of Pawan Kumar, presently working in Saudi Arabia, was recovered and handed over to her parents along with her two children.
4. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the corpus, whose name is not being disclosed in order to protect her privacy, has informed the State authorities that she had left her matrimonial home on account of certain disputes and is presently residing happily at her parental home along with her two children. It is further submitted that the father of the corpus has also informed the State authorities that, since the corpus has been traced and recovered, he does not wish to pursue the missing person report any further. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hare Ram Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Nisha Bharti And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Under the circumstances, nothing further survives in the present petition. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. October 9, 2026 R.S. Tiwari HABC No. 1338 of 2026 2 (Achal Sachdev,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad