Allahabad High Court

NA529/4884/2026 of MANORMA DEVI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4884 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4884 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned to decide Case No. 1875 of 2025 (Manorma Devi and another vs. Binod Kumar Giri), under Section 147 BNSS/128 Cr.P.C., pending before the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jaunpur, expeditiously within stipulated period. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that applicant No. 1 has a daughter, applicant No. 2, aged about six years, who is residing with her mother (applicant No. 1). It is further submitted that applicant No. 1, along with her daughter, is residing at her parental home and is somehow managing to meet the expenses of her daughter's maintenance and livelihood. It is further submitted that applicant No. 1 initially instituted Case No. 1763 of 2022 under Section 125 Cr.P.C. against opposite party No. 2 before the court concerned. Upon consideration of the pleadings and evidence on record, the learned court concerned awarded monthly maintenance of Rs. 1,400/- to applicant No. 1 and Rs. 600/- to applicant No. 2. It is further submitted that despite the lapse of approximately three years, opposite party No. 2 has not paid any amount towards the maintenance awarded by the learned court concerned. Consequently, the applicants instituted Execution Case No. 1875 of 2025 under Section 147 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/128 Cr.P.C., against opposite Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manorma Devi And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

party No. 2 for enforcement of the maintenance order. It is lastly submitted that the aforesaid execution proceedings are still pending consideration before the court concerned. Considering the above facts and circumstances without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the execution case filed under Section 128 Cr.P.C./147 BNSS, in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to the parties as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. October 9, 2026 Brijesh NA529 No. 4884 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead