Allahabad High Court
A227/14313/2026 of SMT SUNITA PAL AND 2 OTHERS Vs RAMKHELAWAN PAL on 8 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14313 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "( a ). Issue order or direction directing to respondents to decide the suit bearing suit no. 299 of 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14313 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(a). Issue order or direction directing to respondents to decide the suit bearing suit no. 299 of 2026 (smt. Sunita Pal vs. Ram Khelawan Pal) pending before the civil judge senior division Fatehpur, expeditiously preferably within specific period."
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the prayer made in the writ petition and is only confining to a direction for deciding the 6-C application moved in Original Suit No. 299 of 2026, which is pending consideration.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to make every endeavour to decide the temporary injunction application 6-C, in case, the same is pending consideration in Original Suit No. 299 of 2026, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month, from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 9, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Dwivedi, Pavan Kumar, Suresh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Smt Sunita Pal And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Ramkhelawan Pal .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad