Allahabad High Court
BAIL/36117/2026 of JUGENDRA SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. on 8 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36117 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Brijesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the accused- applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36117 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Brijesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the accused- applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant Jugendra Singh to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 332 of 2026, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(1), 351(3) BNS, P.S.- Khair, District- Aligarh, during the pendency of trial.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated belatedly in F.I.R. dated 23.05.2026 lodged by Durgesh Kumar with the allegation that the accused-applicant and his brother had taken Rs.1.5 lakhs for getting him appointed in tubewell department. Further contended that no such amount has been taken on the basis of the assurance made. The applicant has one case criminal history, which is matrimonial in nature, wherein the trial is continuing. The applicant is in jail since 16.07.2026 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. for State has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considered that the money has been paid for getting a job. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brijesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jugendra Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. October 9, 2026 Shivangi BAIL No. 36117 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad