NABAIL/9997/2026 of SAMRENDRA TIWARI @ MAYANK TIWARI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 8 October 2026

1. Heard Sri Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Atul Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the informant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

2. Learned A.G.A. has raised a preliminary objection that the one of the offences for which the applicant is seeking anticipatory bail is Section 65(1) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. Section 482(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 clearly bars the applicability of the provision of anticipatory bail for offences under Sections 65 and 70(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

4. On such objection being raised by the learned A.G.A., learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present application with liberty to move an appropriate application for grant of regular bail.

5. For a period of fifteen days from today or till filing of regular bail application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case..

6. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. October 9, 2026/Lalit Shukla Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari, Sampoorna Nand Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Atul Kumar Srivastava, G.A. (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Samrendra Tiwari @ Mayank Tiwari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad