Allahabad High Court

CRLP/24020/2026 of MOHIT AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24020 of 2026 Court No. - 45 HON'BLE SALIL KUMAR RAI, J. HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State-respondent nos. 1 & 2. 2. The present writ petition has been filed

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24020 of 2026

Court No. - 45

HON'BLE SALIL KUMAR RAI, J.

HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State-respondent nos. 1 & 2.

2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the F.I.R. dated 16.09.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 678 of 2026, under Sections 223, 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) B.N.S., Police Station- Bisrakh Madhy Commissionerate Gautam Budh Nagar, District Gautam Budh Nagar.

3. It has been argued by the counsel for the petitioners that the recitals in the First Information Report itself shows that the First Information Report has been registered only to recover the alleged money paid to the petitioners which fact is also disputed. It was further argued that the first informant has civil remedy and criminal proceedings are not maintainable.

4. Learned AGA has opposed the present petition.

5. In view of the order proposed to be passed, it would serve no useful purpose by issuing notice to respondent no. 3 and calling for a counter affidavit.

6. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case and after considering the arguments of the counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioners shall not be arrested in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 16.09.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 678 of 2026, under Sections 223, 318(4), Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mohit And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

336(3), 338, 340(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) B.N.S., Police Station- Bisrakh Madhy Commissionerate Gautam Budh Nagar, District Gautam Budh Nagar, till submission of the police report/charge-sheet under Section 193 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. October 9, 2026 Rama Kant CRLP No. 24020 of 2026 2 (Padam Narain Mishra,J.) (Salil Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead