Allahabad High Court
NA529/4906/2026 of KRISHNA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 12 OTHERS on 8 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4906 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4906 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned to decide the trial of Case No. 1065 of 2023 (State vs. Kishan and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 135 of 2022, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 427, 506 IPC, Police Station Barsana, District Mathura, pending before the Court of learned Civil Judge (S.D.), Chhata, District Mathura, expeditiously within stipulated period. It is submitted that the charge-sheet in the subject case was filed on 06.03.2023, whereupon the learned court concerned took cognizance thereof on 11.04.2023. It is submitted that after taking cognizance, the aforesaid case is pending before the court concerned for more than 3 and 1/2 years, but nothing has been done in the case due to non-cooperation by the opposite party nos. 2 to 13. The applicant submits that such inordinate and unexplained delay in the conclusion of the trial, which has been pending since 2023, is violative of the applicant's right to a speedy trial. Looking to the aforesaid circumstances, it is directed that trial pending before the concerned court be concluded expeditiously, as early as possible, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gaya Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Subham Krishna .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 12 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
The application is disposed of. October 9, 2026 Brijesh NA529 No. 4906 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad