Allahabad High Court
A227/14306/2026 of TANNU YADAV AND ANOTHER Vs PHOOLMATI DEVI AND 3 OTHERS on 8 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14306 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i- to direct the The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Mau to decide the M.А.С.Р. по. 38 of 2025 (Tannu
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14306 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i- to direct the The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Mau to decide the M.А.С.Р. по. 38 of 2025 (Tannu Yadav and another Vs. Phoolmati Devi and others) under section 166 of The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 pending before The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Mau within stipulated period."
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that Motor Accident Claims Petition is pending consideration since 2025 before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mau. The sole prayer is for early disposal of the said case.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the private respondent, the matter is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the pending Motor Accident Claims Petition No.38 of 2025, after hearing all the concerned parties, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. October 9, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivam Kumar Modanwal Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Tannu Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) Phoolmati Devi And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad