Allahabad High Court

WRIC/39863/2026 of SIYARAM Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39863 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Mr. Mathura Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Pradeep Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 39863 of 2026

Court No. - 37

HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Mr. Mathura Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Pradeep Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha.

2. The instant petition has been filed for the following relief: "I. a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding / direction the respondent no.2 i.e. Tehsildar Tehsil Shahganj, District Jaunpur to decide the proceeding under section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, in case no.13324 of as computerized case no.T202614360113324 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Ram Chandra pending in the court of Tehsildar Tehsil- Shahganj, District Jaunpur, since 1.6.2026 within some stipulated period provided by this Hon'ble Court."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner/ complainant submitted that the pending proceeding against private respondent no.4, under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 should be decided within time bound period.

4. I have considered the argument advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records.

5. The proceeding under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Mishra, Mathura Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Siyaram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

2006 is pending against the private respondent no.4 at the instance of gaon sabha, as such, the instant writ petition at the instance of petitioner/ complainant to expedite the proceeding under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 cannot be entertained.

6. The writ petition is dismissed. October 9, 2026 Rameez WRIC No. 39863 of 2026

(Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead