Allahabad High Court

WRIC/33215/2026 of SUNDAR LAL Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33215 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The instant petition has

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 33215 of 2026

Court No. - 37

HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. The instant petition has been filed for mandamus directing the respondent no.2/ Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Shahjahanpur to decide the Case No.10 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.T202512610112637) (Sundar Lal vs. Ramkumar and others), under Section 144 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the suit under Section 144 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 filed at the instance of petitioner is pending before respondent no.2/ Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Shahjahanpur. He further submitted that the copy of order sheet of the case has been annexed as Annexure No.2 to the petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding expeditiously.

4. Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances, respondent no.2 is directed to decide the aforementioned case after framing issues and affording opportunity to the parties to lead evidence in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kukmar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sundar Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

copy of this order before him.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is finally disposed of. October 9, 2026 Rameez WRIC No. 33215 of 2026 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead