Allahabad High Court
CRLP/24027/2026 of DINESH KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 8 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24027 of 2026 Court No. - 45 HON'BLE SALIL KUMAR RAI, J. HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J. 1. Heard Shri Pawan Kumar, the counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Chhaaya Gautam, the counsel appearing for respondent no. 4 and learned AGA for the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24027 of 2026
Court No. - 45
HON'BLE SALIL KUMAR RAI, J.
HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Pawan Kumar, the counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Chhaaya Gautam, the counsel appearing for respondent no. 4 and learned AGA for the State-respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3.
2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the First Information Report dated 17.09.2026 in case crime no. 392/2026, under Sections 338, 336(3), 340(2), 318(4), 61(2) of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (B.N.S.), Police Station- Jalesar, District- Etah.
3. It has been argued by the counsel for the petitioner that the insurance policy was executed in the name of the deceased after completing the necessary formalities which included medical examination of the deceased and the recitals in the First Information Report regarding any fraud having been committed, are false. It was further argued that in any case for recovery of the amount, the Insurance Company has the remedy before the appropriate authorities and criminal proceedings are not maintainable.
4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for respondent no. 4 have opposed the present petition.
5. In view of the order proposed to be passed, it would serve no useful purpose by calling for a counter affidavit.
6. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case and after considering the arguments of the counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall not be Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Singh, Pawan Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Dinesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
arrested in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 17.09.2026 in case crime no. 392/2026, under Sections 338, 336(3), 340(2), 318(4), 61(2) of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (B.N.S.), Police Station- Jalesar, District- Etah, till submission of the police report/charge-sheet under Section 193 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. October 9, 2026 Rama Kant CRLP No. 24027 of 2026 2 (Padam Narain Mishra,J.) (Salil Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad