Allahabad High Court
WRIC/23433/2026 of RAJESH KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS on 8 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 23433 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This Court has passed following order on 25.8.2026: "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 23433 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This Court has passed following order on 25.8.2026: "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Harendra Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent no.6. The present writ petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of the revision filed by the petitioner under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. It is further contended that although the revision has been admitted, no interim stay order has been passed therein. Sri Harendra Yadav, learned counsel for respondent no. 6, states that the revision pertains to the year 2026 and has not even been admitted till date. In view of the aforesaid conflicting submissions, the petitioner is directed to place on record the order by means of which the aforesaid revision has been admitted by the Additional Commissioner, Varanasi Division, Varanasi. Put up as fresh on 17.09.2026. "
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that now revision petition has been numbered and prayed that it be decided expeditiously.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection against the aforesaid submission. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hriday Narayan Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C., Harendra Yadav Rajesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. In the aforesaid circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that the revision petition be decided expeditiously after hearing all concerned parties.
October 9, 2026 SB WRIC No. 23433 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad