Allahabad High Court
NA528/44003/2026 of VIKASH SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 8 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 44003 of 2026 Court No. - 74 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Raj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State and perused the record. 3. This application under Section
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 44003 of 2026
Court No. - 74
HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. List revised.
2. Heard Sri Raj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State and perused the record.
3. This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicant Vikash Singh with the prayer to allow this application and to allow this application and quash the impugned NBW dated 03.09.2024 being S.T. No. 261 of 2017 arising out of Case Crime No. 304 of 2016, under Sections 436, 427, 504, 506 IPC and 3(1)(10) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Maharajganj, District Jaunpur, pending in the court of Special Judge, SC/ST Act / Additional Session Judge, Court No.4, Jaunpur (State Vs. Jitendra Singh and others).
4. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant states that the purpose of the applicant would suffice if an order is passed directing the trial court to decide the bail application of the applicant as expeditiously as possible. He further states that although the prayer has been made for quashing of the said NBW of the aforesaid case but he does not press the same.
5. Learned counsel for the State has no objection of aforesaid arguments of learned counsel for the applicant.
6. In view of the above, the prayer for quashing of the said NBW of the aforesaid case is dismissed as not pressed.
7. However, in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the limited prayer of learned counsel for the applicant it is directed that if the accused-applicant surrenders before the trial court concerned or on before 24.10.2026 and applies for bail, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Till Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Yadav, Raj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vikash Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
24.10.2026 or the date the applicant appears whichever is earlier, coercive measures, if any, issued against him shall be kept in abeyance.
8. The present application stands disposed of.
9. Registrar (Compliance) to communicate this order to the concerned trial court within one week. October 9, 2026 M. ARIF NA528 No. 44003 of 2026 2 (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad